United States security reports

F

Freddie Mac

freddiemac.com

74

The website demonstrates a generally solid technical security foundation with no critical vulnerabilities detected and strong scores in email security, network security, SSL/TLS, and DNS health. However, significant gaps exist in regulatory compliance and governance, particularly regarding GDPR and NIS2 mandates, which present substantial legal and operational risks. The absence of essential policies such as cookie consent, incident response, and security frameworks exposes the organization to potential regulatory penalties and undermines customer trust. Missing key security headers and mixed content issues indicate areas where the website’s resilience against common web attacks can be improved. While foundational network and protocol configurations are strong, the low scores in compliance reflect a need for urgent attention to documentation, privacy, and incident management. Overall, the security posture is functional but incomplete, with business-critical exposure due to compliance shortcomings. Addressing these gaps will enhance legal compliance, customer confidence, and incident readiness, thereby reducing potential financial and reputational damage.

F

Fannie Mae

fanniemae.com

63

The website demonstrates a mixed security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium-risk issues that could impact both security and regulatory compliance. Notably, the absence of key GDPR-related elements such as Privacy and Cookie Policies, and a consent banner, exposes the business to potential legal penalties and loss of user trust. Security headers are inadequately configured, increasing susceptibility to common web attacks like cross-site scripting. The lacking information security framework and incident response procedures indicate immature cybersecurity governance, risking delayed or ineffective handling of security incidents. SSL certificate expiration and mixed content issues threaten secure communications, while missing DNSSEC and email authentication elements could allow domain spoofing or phishing attacks. Positively, network security and DNS health are strong, providing a solid foundation. Overall, immediate focus on compliance and security policy establishment is critical to safeguard business operations and reputation.

D

DotLoop LLC

dotloop.com

74

The website demonstrates a generally strong network and email security posture, with high scores in networkSecurity (100/100) and emailSecurity (95/100). However, significant gaps exist in compliance and governance areas, particularly related to GDPR and NIS2 regulations, where scores are notably low (43/100 and 25/100 respectively). Critical business risks stem from missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, lack of information security frameworks, and absent incident response and business continuity plans. Security headers are partially implemented but lack essential protections like Content-Security-Policy, increasing exposure to web-based attacks. SSL/TLS configurations are good overall but require timely certificate renewal and improved HSTS settings. DNS health is solid but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC. Addressing these deficiencies is crucial to mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks, protect customer data, and ensure operational resilience against security incidents.

O

Osano, Inc.

trusthub.com

71

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected and strong scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, significant gaps exist in compliance-related areas, notably GDPR and NIS2 regulatory requirements, which expose the business to legal and operational risks. Missing cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and privacy policy issues create potential non-compliance liabilities under data protection laws. Additionally, the absence of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and security contact information undermines the organization's ability to effectively manage security incidents and regulatory audits. Security headers are partially implemented but lack key protections, increasing the risk of clickjacking and cross-site scripting. Email security is reasonably well configured but can be improved with DKIM and DMARC enhancements. DNS security is good but would benefit from enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records to prevent unauthorized certificate issuance. Overall, the company should prioritize compliance maturity and governance to reduce business risk while reinforcing technical controls.

A

Aryeo

aryeo.com

66

The website demonstrates several significant security gaps that could expose the business to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. While there are no critical vulnerabilities, the presence of multiple high and medium severity issues in security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulatory adherence, and SSL/TLS configuration indicate an urgent need for remediation. The low scores in security headers (30/100), GDPR (43/100), and especially NIS2 (25/100) highlight weaknesses in both technical controls and governance practices. Email security and network security are relatively strong, reducing some exposure to phishing and network-based attacks. However, the absence of key policies and procedures, such as incident response and vulnerability disclosure, leaves the organization ill-prepared for security events. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms also risks non-compliance fines under data protection laws. Overall, the organization should prioritize strengthening foundational security controls and compliance frameworks to protect customer data and maintain trust.

C

Contentful

contentfulstatus.com

68

The website exhibits significant security gaps, particularly in compliance, email security, and incident management frameworks, which pose substantial risks to business operations and regulatory adherence. Critical and high severity issues, such as the absence of email authentication and missing key security headers, expose the organization to phishing attacks, data breaches, and clickjacking vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is notably weak, with no cookie policy or consent mechanism, risking regulatory fines and eroding customer trust. The lack of documented information security and incident response policies under NIS2 directives indicates unpreparedness for cyber incidents, threatening operational resilience. Although network security and SSL/TLS configurations show strengths, weaknesses in DNS security and HTTP security headers reduce overall protection. Addressing these issues promptly will reduce exposure to cyber threats, improve regulatory compliance, and enhance customer confidence. Prioritizing governance and technical controls will support sustainable security posture improvements. Incremental remediation aligned with business priorities is essential to mitigate risks effectively.

Z

Zillow Group

zillowgroup.com

69

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues found, but several high and medium severity gaps that pose significant risks. Key vulnerabilities include missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures such as cookie policy and consent mechanisms, and absence of comprehensive security governance aligned with NIS2 requirements. While network security and email security are strong, deficiencies in incident response, security policy documentation, and vulnerability disclosure processes expose the business to operational and regulatory risks. The presence of mixed content and weak HSTS configurations could lead to data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Non-compliance with GDPR and NIS2 frameworks may result in regulatory penalties and damage to brand reputation. Immediate remediation will reduce exposure to cyber threats and enhance customer trust. Overall, addressing these gaps is critical to aligning security practices with business continuity and regulatory expectations.

M

Move, Inc.

move.com

63

The website demonstrates a moderate to weak overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but numerous high and medium risk issues, particularly in security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory alignment. Key gaps include missing essential HTTP security headers and absence of privacy and cookie policies, which increase exposure to data breaches and regulatory penalties. The lack of incident response procedures, security policy documentation, and security framework indicate immature security governance, potentially impacting business resilience. Email security, SSL/TLS configuration, DNS health, and network security show relatively strong controls, mitigating some risks. However, missing GDPR elements and security headers threaten customer trust and compliance standing, which could lead to legal consequences and brand damage. Immediate remediation in these areas will strengthen defense-in-depth and regulatory compliance. Overall, the site needs focused improvements in baseline security controls and policy implementations to reduce risk and ensure data protection.

W

WSJ Barrons Group

wsjbg-adsmanager.com

73

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation with perfect SSL/TLS and network security scores and good DNS health. However, significant gaps exist in governance, compliance, and policy frameworks, particularly around GDPR and NIS2 requirements, which pose substantial business and regulatory risks. Critical headers like Content-Security-Policy are missing, increasing the risk of client-side attacks. The absence of cookie policies and consent mechanisms exposes the business to GDPR non-compliance penalties. Furthermore, the lack of an information security framework, incident response plans, and clear security contacts undermines the organization's ability to manage and respond to cyber threats effectively. While email security and DNS configurations are above average, enabling DNSSEC and adding DKIM records would enhance protection against spoofing and phishing. Overall, the organization's security posture requires urgent attention to policy, compliance, and response capabilities to reduce legal exposure and improve resilience against cyber incidents.

D

Dow Jones

djreprints.com

68

The website exhibits a concerning security posture with no critical issues but multiple high and medium severity vulnerabilities, primarily related to missing security headers, GDPR compliance gaps, and lack of foundational NIS2 security documentation. The absence of key HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy exposes the site to common web-based attacks like clickjacking, content injection, and downgrade attacks. GDPR compliance deficiencies, including missing cookie consent and incomplete privacy policies, present legal and reputational risks. Furthermore, the lack of an information security framework, incident response procedures, and security policy documentation indicates immature security governance. While email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security show relatively strong scores, the overall low NIS2 compliance score signals significant gaps in regulatory adherence and operational readiness. Immediate focus on governance, policy implementation, and security header configuration will mitigate business risks and enhance trust. Addressing these issues is critical to safeguarding customer data, ensuring regulatory compliance, and maintaining brand reputation.

A

Allworth Financial

allworthpartners.com

96

The website demonstrates a strong overall security posture with no critical or high-level vulnerabilities detected. Core security components such as email security, SSL/TLS configuration, and network security are fully optimized, scoring 100/100. However, medium-level issues related to missing security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 directives, and DNS security indicate areas for improvement. The absence of DNSSEC and incomplete DNS configurations slightly reduce the DNS module score to 85/100. These medium-severity findings could expose the business to regulatory penalties, data integrity risks, and potential targeted attacks if unaddressed. The low-severity issues, including missing CAA records, suggest opportunities to further harden DNS configurations. Addressing these areas will enhance regulatory compliance, reduce attack surface, and improve customer trust. Overall, the site is secure but requires focused remediation in compliance and DNS security to maintain resilience and meet evolving standards.

A

Allworth Financial

allworthfinancial.com

93

The overall security posture of the website is solid with no critical issues detected, and strong performance in email security, SSL/TLS, and network security modules. However, there are notable medium and high-risk concerns primarily related to DNS configuration and regulatory compliance. The most pressing issue is an unregistered MX record, which can lead to email delivery failures and potential exposure to phishing or spoofing attacks. Additionally, failure to enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records weakens DNS integrity and increases exposure to domain hijacking. The absence of key security headers and incomplete GDPR and NIS2 compliance analyses indicate gaps that could impact regulatory adherence and increase vulnerability to certain web-based attacks. Addressing these issues will significantly improve security posture, regulatory compliance, and trust with customers and partners. Immediate remediation of DNS configuration issues is critical to maintaining business continuity and safeguarding brand reputation.

The website demonstrates a concerning security posture with no critical issues but several high-impact vulnerabilities primarily related to missing security headers, lack of GDPR compliance, and absence of essential security policies. Key risks include exposure to man-in-the-middle attacks due to missing Strict-Transport-Security, clickjacking threats from absent X-Frame-Options, and legal/regulatory risks stemming from missing privacy and cookie policies. The lack of an incident response plan and security framework further exposes the business to prolonged downtime and data breaches. While email security, DNS health, and network security scores are relatively strong, deficiencies in SSL/TLS configuration and mixed content issues reduce overall trustworthiness. Immediate remediation is necessary to protect user data, comply with regulations, and maintain customer confidence. Addressing these gaps will significantly reduce the risk of cyber incidents and potential financial and reputational damage. Overall, the site requires focused security governance and technical improvements to elevate its security maturity to an acceptable business standard.

E

Egnyte

egnyte.com

76

The website exhibits a generally strong security posture in network security, SSL/TLS configuration, and email security, scoring near or at 100 in these areas. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 requirements, leading to low scores of 43 and 25 respectively. Critical business risks stem from missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, absence of an information security framework, and lack of incident response procedures, which expose the organization to regulatory penalties and operational disruptions. Security headers are mostly implemented but lack some key controls that could reduce exposure to information leakage. DNS health is adequate but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC to prevent domain spoofing. Overall, the website is secure from common network and transport layer attacks but vulnerable to regulatory compliance violations and incident management deficiencies, which could impact business reputation and continuity.

The website exhibits a moderate overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected but several high and medium-risk issues that require immediate attention. GDPR compliance is notably weak, scoring 43/100, primarily due to the absence of a cookie policy and consent banner, exposing the business to regulatory risks and potential fines. The NIS2 compliance score is critically low at 25/100, reflecting significant gaps in information security governance, incident response, and security documentation, which could impair the organization’s ability to manage cyber threats and regulatory obligations. Security headers and email security are average but have room for improvement to mitigate common web and email-based attacks. SSL/TLS and DNS configurations are generally strong, but mixed content and missing DNSSEC reduce overall protection. Network security posture is excellent, indicating robust infrastructure defenses. Immediate remediation will reduce legal liability, enhance trust with customers, and strengthen the organization's resilience against cyber threats.

The website demonstrates a mixed security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium-risk issues that could expose the business to significant threats. Major gaps exist in security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to the NIS2 directive, particularly around incident response and information security frameworks. The absence of essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options increases the risk of web-based attacks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. GDPR compliance weaknesses, including missing cookie consent and privacy policy concerns, expose the business to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Key NIS2 deficiencies highlight a lack of documented security policies and incident management, which could impair response to cyber incidents. SSL/TLS weaknesses and missing DNS security measures further elevate risk by potentially allowing interception or manipulation of data. Positively, email security and network security postures are strong, reducing some risks related to email spoofing and network-based attacks. Overall, urgent remediation is needed to protect the business, customer data, and ensure regulatory compliance while maintaining stakeholder trust.

F

FMS Solutions

fmssolutions.com

60

The website demonstrates significant security weaknesses, particularly in critical HTTP security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 cybersecurity requirements. No critical vulnerabilities were found, but twelve high-severity issues indicate substantial risk exposure, especially related to missing security headers and lack of privacy policies. The absence of key headers like Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy increases susceptibility to common web attacks such as clickjacking, man-in-the-middle, and cross-site scripting. GDPR compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, expose the business to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Additionally, the lack of documented information security frameworks, incident response, and business continuity plans under NIS2 requirements presents operational risks. SSL/TLS implementation is weak due to expiring certificates, weak key lengths, and mixed content, which may undermine user trust and data confidentiality. DNS and network security are relatively strong, but DNSSEC and CAA records should be configured to enhance domain integrity. Immediate remediation is necessary to protect customer data, maintain compliance, and safeguard business continuity.

The website exhibits critical security vulnerabilities primarily due to the absence of HTTPS encryption, severely impacting data confidentiality and trustworthiness. Compliance with GDPR is notably poor, with missing cookie consent banners and potentially non-compliant privacy policies, exposing the business to regulatory fines and reputational damage. The NIS2 framework-related deficiencies indicate a lack of formalized security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure processes, increasing operational risk and reducing resilience against cyber threats. While network and email security postures are strong, these strengths do not compensate for fundamental issues in encryption and governance. Low-severity issues like weak referrer-policy headers and caching of sensitive data should be addressed to minimize attack surface. Overall, the security posture is inadequate for protecting customer data and ensuring regulatory compliance, necessitating immediate remediation. Prioritizing encryption and governance frameworks will significantly enhance business security and stakeholder confidence.

B

Best Western Plus Casino Royale Hotel

casinoroyalehotel.com

45

The website's overall security posture is critically weak, with multiple high and critical severity issues posing significant risks to business operations and compliance. The absence of HTTPS encryption represents an immediate threat to data confidentiality and integrity, undermining user trust and exposing sensitive information to interception. Key security headers are missing, leaving the site vulnerable to common web attacks such as clickjacking, MIME-type sniffing, and cross-site scripting. GDPR compliance is severely lacking, increasing regulatory and legal risks due to missing cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and privacy safeguards. The lack of an established information security framework, incident response procedures, and business continuity plans further exacerbates operational risks under the NIS2 directive. While network security and email security show some strengths, critical gaps in SSL/TLS implementation and DNS security reduce overall trustworthiness. Urgent remediation is required to protect user data, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain business continuity in the face of evolving cyber threats.

H

Hays PLC

hays.com

55

The website's overall security posture is critically weak, primarily due to the complete absence of HTTPS encryption, which exposes all data transmissions to interception and manipulation. Compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations is severely lacking, risking significant legal and financial penalties, especially given the missing cookie policy, consent mechanisms, and absence of key security governance documents. While network security and email security show strong implementation, fundamental weaknesses in security headers and encryption overshadow these strengths. The lack of an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy further increases the risk of prolonged breaches and reputational damage. DNS security is moderately good but can be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks. Immediate remediation is essential to protect user data, maintain customer trust, and ensure regulatory compliance. Without urgent action, the business faces increased exposure to cyber threats and potential regulatory sanctions.

The website's security posture is critically weak, exposing the business to significant risks including data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and operational disruptions. The absence of HTTPS encryption is the most severe vulnerability, risking data interception and undermining customer trust. Missing fundamental security headers further exposes the platform to common web attacks such as clickjacking, cross-site scripting, and content injection. Non-compliance with GDPR, especially lacking cookie policies and consent mechanisms, increases legal and financial liabilities. The exposure of critical services like MySQL and FTP without adequate protections heightens the risk of unauthorized access and data loss. Additionally, the lack of documented security policies, incident response plans, and business continuity strategies indicates poor preparedness for cyber incidents. While email security scores well, network security and governance frameworks are significantly lacking, undermining overall resilience. Immediate remediation is essential to protect business reputation, customer data, and ensure regulatory compliance.

I

IQVIA

imshealth.com

50

The website's security posture currently exhibits significant vulnerabilities that pose notable risks to business operations and customer trust. Most critically, the absence of HTTPS encryption exposes all data transmissions to interception and manipulation, violating GDPR and NIS2 compliance requirements and potentially leading to regulatory penalties. The lack of fundamental privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms further threatens legal compliance and customer confidence. Additionally, missing core security governance elements such as incident response, security policies, and vulnerability disclosure indicate a weak security management framework. While network and email security show strengths, critical gaps in web security headers and DNS configurations leave attack surfaces open. Immediate remediation is essential to prevent data breaches, reputational damage, and compliance failures. Overall, the website needs a prioritized security overhaul to align with industry standards and regulatory mandates.

M

Merkle

merkleinc.com

49

The website exhibits a poor overall security posture with critical vulnerabilities that expose it to significant risks. The absence of HTTPS encryption is the most alarming issue, affecting GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulations, and user data confidentiality. Key security headers are missing, increasing susceptibility to common web attacks such as cross-site scripting and data leakage. The lack of essential GDPR components, including a cookie consent banner and compliant privacy policy, poses legal and reputational risks. Organizational security maturity is low, with no documented security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure processes, indicating weak governance. Email security is moderate but requires improvements to prevent phishing and spoofing attacks. DNS security is relatively strong, while network security demonstrates a good posture. Immediate remediation is needed to protect sensitive data, comply with regulations, and maintain customer trust.

E

Energy Intelligence Group, Inc.

energyintel.com

54

The website's overall security posture is currently poor, with multiple critical and high-severity issues that pose significant risks to both data protection and regulatory compliance. The absence of HTTPS encryption is the most critical vulnerability, exposing user data to interception and undermining trust. Compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations is severely lacking, including missing cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and essential security governance documentation. While email security and network security appear strong, fundamental web security headers and DNS configurations require improvement. The failure to implement proper incident response and business continuity plans further increases operational risk. Immediate remediation is essential to protect sensitive customer information, maintain regulatory compliance, and safeguard the organization's reputation. Without urgent action, the business risks data breaches, legal penalties, and loss of customer confidence.

B

Bank of America

ml.com

49

The website's overall security posture is currently at high risk, with multiple critical and high-severity issues identified. The absence of HTTPS encryption is a critical vulnerability that exposes all data transmissions to interception, significantly undermining confidentiality and trust. GDPR compliance is severely lacking, with missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, which may lead to legal and regulatory penalties. The lack of essential security headers increases the risk of common web attacks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. Additionally, the absence of fundamental NIS2 security governance elements, including incident response and security policies, indicates a weak organizational security framework. While DNS and network security are relatively strong, the critical gaps in application-layer security and compliance pose significant business risks. Immediate remediation is necessary to protect customer data, maintain regulatory compliance, and preserve brand reputation. Without urgent action, the business faces potential data breaches, regulatory fines, and erosion of customer trust.

J

Johnson Controls

johnsoncontrols.com

68

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities found; however, several high and medium-risk issues significantly impact compliance and risk management. Key deficiencies exist in GDPR compliance, including the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of user consent mechanisms, exposing the business to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. The absence of a documented information security framework, incident response procedures, and security policies under NIS2 guidance further increases organizational risk and may hinder regulatory adherence. Security headers are inconsistently implemented, reducing protection against common web threats like XSS and content sniffing. SSL/TLS configurations are generally strong but require timely certificate renewal and elimination of mixed content to maintain secure communications. DNS settings are mostly healthy but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC to prevent domain spoofing. Positively, email and network security postures are robust, mitigating some external attack vectors. Overall, urgent attention to compliance and governance-related controls is critical to safeguard the business and maintain trust with users and regulators.

B

Brunner

brunnerworks.com

47

The website brunnerworks.com exhibits a critically weak security posture primarily due to the absence of HTTPS encryption and lack of essential security policies, exposing the business to significant data breaches and regulatory non-compliance risks. While network security and email security measures are relatively strong, major gaps in privacy compliance, security governance, and web security headers leave the site vulnerable to attacks and legal penalties.

C

Chrome Industries

chromeindustries.com

72

ChromeIndustries.com demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high-risk issues, particularly around GDPR compliance and foundational security frameworks. The absence of key policies and weak encryption practices expose the business to regulatory risks and potential incident management challenges. Addressing these gaps is essential to protect customer data, maintain regulatory compliance, and uphold brand trust.

F

Fairmont

fairmont.com

67

Fairmont.com's overall security posture exhibits several significant gaps, particularly in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 requirements, as well as missing critical security headers that protect against common web threats. While network security and SSL/TLS configurations are relatively strong, the absence of foundational policies and controls increases business risk, including potential regulatory fines and reputational damage.

L

Le Méridien

lemeridien.com

64

Le Meridien's website exhibits significant security and compliance gaps, particularly in web security headers, data privacy, and organizational security policies. While network and email security are strong, the absence of critical headers and GDPR/NIS2 compliance measures exposes the business to data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Immediate attention is required to address these vulnerabilities to safeguard customer trust and ensure regulatory compliance.

U

USLI

usli.com

61

The website usli.com demonstrates significant security weaknesses, particularly in foundational security headers, GDPR compliance, and overall information security governance, resulting in a concerning overall risk posture. While network security and email security are relatively strong, critical gaps in SSL/TLS configuration, security policies, and privacy practices expose the business to potential data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.

L

Lee & Associates

lee-associates.com

64

The website https://lee-associates.com exhibits significant security and compliance gaps, particularly in web security headers, GDPR compliance, and organizational security policies, resulting in an overall unknown risk score. While email security and SSL/TLS configurations are relatively strong, the presence of high-risk exposed services and lack of incident response and security governance expose the business to potential data breaches and regulatory penalties.

J

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

careersatchase.com

69

The website https://careersatchase.com demonstrates a generally strong technical security posture in network, TLS, and email security; however, it exhibits significant compliance and governance gaps, particularly relating to GDPR and NIS2 regulatory requirements. These deficiencies expose the business to legal risks, reputational damage, and potential operational disruptions. Addressing these issues promptly is essential to safeguard user privacy, meet regulatory obligations, and maintain stakeholder trust.

A

Appcast

recruitonomics.com

61

Recruitonomics.com demonstrates significant security and compliance gaps, notably in web security headers, GDPR compliance, and foundational information security practices. While network and DNS security appear strong, critical deficiencies in incident response, security policies, and data protection expose the business to regulatory, reputational, and operational risks.

T

The Infatuation

theinfatuation.com

68

TheInfatuation.com currently exhibits significant security gaps, particularly in web security headers, GDPR compliance, and organizational security policies, which collectively expose the business to data privacy risks, regulatory non-compliance, and potential web-based attacks. While foundational network and email security measures are strong, critical deficiencies in incident response, security governance, and user data protection warrant immediate attention to safeguard brand reputation and customer trust.

M

Morgan Health

morganhealth.com

69

Morgan Health’s website exhibits a solid technical security foundation with strong network security and SSL/TLS configurations, but significant gaps exist in compliance and governance areas, particularly around GDPR and NIS2 requirements. The absence of privacy policies, consent mechanisms, and documented security frameworks creates substantial business risk, including regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Addressing these compliance and policy deficiencies is critical to achieving a mature security posture and maintaining stakeholder trust.

C

CarMax

carmaxautotech.com

60

The security posture of carmaxautotech.com is currently weak, with multiple critical and high-risk vulnerabilities that expose the business to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and operational disruptions. Key gaps in security headers, GDPR compliance, incident response, and email authentication pose immediate risks to customer trust and legal standing. Urgent remediation is necessary to protect business continuity and maintain customer confidence.

A

Ally Financial Inc.

ally.com

75

Ally.com demonstrates a generally sound security posture in network, email, SSL/TLS, and DNS configurations, but suffers from significant compliance and governance gaps, particularly related to GDPR and NIS2 requirements. The absence of critical policies and frameworks exposes the organization to regulatory risks and potential incident management challenges. Addressing these deficiencies is vital to reduce legal exposure and strengthen overall security resilience.

M

Manheim

manheim.com

68

Manheim.com demonstrates strong foundational network, SSL/TLS, and email security, but exhibits significant weaknesses in web security headers, privacy compliance, and governance frameworks. The absence of critical policies and controls related to GDPR and NIS2 regulations poses considerable legal and operational risks that could impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

C

Cars Commerce

carscommerce.inc

64

CarsCommerce.inc exhibits significant security gaps, particularly in web security headers, privacy compliance, and organizational security policies, resulting in a high overall risk exposure despite no critical vulnerabilities detected. The absence of key protections like HSTS, content security policies, and GDPR compliance measures exposes the business to reputational, regulatory, and operational risks. Immediate remediation is essential to safeguard customer trust, ensure legal compliance, and prevent potential security incidents.

C

CVR

cvrconnect.com

67

The website https://cvrconnect.com has a moderate to low security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but multiple high and medium severity issues, particularly in privacy compliance and security policy frameworks. Key weaknesses in GDPR compliance, missing security headers, and absence of incident response and business continuity plans expose the business to regulatory risks and potential security incidents.

C

CDK Global

cdkglobalheavytruck.com

64

The website https://cdkglobalheavytruck.com exhibits significant security and compliance gaps, particularly in foundational web security headers and regulatory adherence such as GDPR and NIS2. While network and email security postures are relatively strong, missing critical security headers and policy documentation expose the business to increased risk of data breaches, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties.

C

Cars.com

cars.com

70

The website demonstrates strong network, SSL/TLS, and email security, but exhibits significant weaknesses in privacy compliance and security governance frameworks, resulting in a high risk of regulatory and operational exposure. Critical gaps in GDPR adherence and NIS2-related policies, along with missing key security headers, undermine user trust and increase susceptibility to data breaches and compliance penalties.

C

CDK Global

cdkglobal.com

64

The website cdkglobal.com exhibits significant security gaps, particularly in web security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 cybersecurity frameworks, resulting in a low overall security posture. While network security and DNS configurations are relatively strong, critical omissions in security policies and data protection measures expose the business to regulatory, reputational, and operational risks.

R

RouteOne

routeone.com

70

RouteOne's website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with strengths in email and network security, but significant gaps remain in GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulatory adherence, and SSL/TLS configurations. The absence of critical security policies and controls exposes the business to regulatory risks and potential security incidents, which could impact customer trust and operational continuity.

M

Manheim by Cox Automotive

mymanheim.com

67

The website mymanheim.com exhibits significant security and compliance gaps, particularly in email authentication, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 security frameworks. While network security and TLS configurations are relatively strong, critical vulnerabilities in data protection, incident response, and email security pose considerable risks to business operations and reputation.

X

Xtime

xtime.com

71

The security assessment of xtime.com reveals a generally moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but significant high and medium risks that could expose the business to regulatory non-compliance and potential cyber threats. Key gaps in GDPR compliance and foundational security policies, combined with weaknesses in SSL/TLS configuration, present notable risks that should be addressed promptly to protect customer data and maintain trust.

V

VinSolutions

vinsolutions.com

68

The security assessment of vinsolutions.com reveals significant gaps in compliance, cryptographic strength, and incident preparedness, presenting elevated risk exposure despite no critical vulnerabilities. Key weaknesses in GDPR adherence, security policy documentation, and SSL/TLS configurations could impact customer trust and regulatory standing. Immediate remediation is recommended to bolster data protection, secure communications, and incident response capabilities.

D

Dealer.com

dealer.com

67

The website https://dealer.com exhibits a concerning security posture with multiple high and medium-risk issues, particularly in regulatory compliance (GDPR, NIS2) and transport layer security (SSL/TLS). While network and email security are strong, critical gaps in security headers, incident response, and data protection policies expose the business to regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and potential data breaches.