Skip to main content

Security report for indiangamingreport.com

Casino City Press · Media · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Casino City's IndianGamingReport.com is a specialized subscription-based service providing comprehensive research and data on the U.S. Indian gaming industry. The platform offers detailed nationwide and state-level statistics, revenue figures, market analyses, historical data, and future outlooks tailored for a diverse audience including tribes, gaming companies, investors, and regulators. Technically, the website is built on an ASP.NET framework with legacy XHTML markup and utilizes jQuery libraries alongside Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but suffers from an invalid SSL certificate and lacks support for modern TLS protocols, which undermines its security posture. While security headers such as HSTS and CSP are properly configured, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and cookie consent mechanisms indicate areas for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate professionalism and content relevance but requires technical and security enhancements to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indiangamingreport.com

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
85
Average
86
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on niche market intelligence for Indian gaming. Its subscription model targets industry stakeholders requiring up-to-date and historical data. The company, Casino City Press, acts as the parent entity and maintains a consistent brand presence. The service leverages detailed databases and research teams to maintain competitive advantage. Growth opportunities exist in expanding digital maturity and compliance adherence. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes its parent domain. The business model is reliant on subscription revenue streams and specialized content delivery.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate with well-implemented HTTP security headers but critically impaired by an invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support. There is no evidence of formal security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent and explicit data protection officer contact. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager, indicating moderate user tracking without clear data retention policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal. The security score reflects these gaps, highlighting the need for certificate renewal, protocol upgrades, and privacy enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure the SSL certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) to ensure encrypted communications.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an ASP.NET WebForms platform using legacy XHTML 1.0 Transitional markup and jQuery libraries. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS services. Performance metrics are unavailable but inferred as slow due to zero load time and resource count data. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement. SEO optimization is also basic, lacking structured data and Open Graph metadata. Technical debt is evident in outdated markup and missing modern security protocols, posing risks to business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indiangamingreport.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indiangamingreport.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.