Skip to main content

Security report for moonfruit.com

Moonfruit · Media

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moonfruit operates as an online platform connecting businesses with elite digital marketing agencies worldwide. The website positions itself as a comprehensive directory and connector for various digital marketing services including advertising, branding, content marketing, and more. The target audience primarily consists of businesses seeking specialized marketing agency services. The platform leverages modern web technologies such as WordPress CMS, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot analytics, and anti-spam tools to deliver a professional and functional user experience. The website is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with structured data enhancing search visibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforcement and anti-spam measures, though lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity and business credibility but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
66/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set before consent

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (HubSpot cookie banner), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Google Analytics (_ga_TD08D05JE5, _ga); Google (_gcl_au); Hubspot (__hstc, hubspotutk, __hssrc, __hssc).

      What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moonfruit.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
97
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
66
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention moonfruit.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8,611
Employees
0
Customers
8,611
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for moonfruit.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Moonfruit's market positioning as a connector to top-tier digital marketing agencies provides a competitive advantage by aggregating diverse marketing services under one platform. The business model appears to be service-oriented, likely generating revenue through partnerships or referrals with listed agencies. The platform targets medium to large businesses seeking marketing expertise across multiple sectors. The presence of extensive service categories indicates a broad partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit company founding date, parent company, or subsidiaries limits deeper business intelligence. The website content quality and branding consistency support a professional image, though absence of direct contact information may impact user trust. Integration with major analytics and marketing tools suggests active digital marketing efforts and data-driven decision making.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of anti-spam and bot detection plugins. Integration of Google reCAPTCHA and CleanTalk anti-spam indicates proactive measures against automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which may hinder transparency and responsiveness to security incidents. The lack of direct contact channels for security issues further limits incident management capabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing security documentation, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Moonfruit
Description
Find the best digital marketing agencies in the world. At Moonfruit, we connect businesses like yours with the world’s most elite digital marketing agencies.
Key services
Advertising, Amazon Marketing, Branding, Content Marketing, Creative Services, CRO, Digital Agencies, Digital Marketing, Ecommerce, Email Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.1.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Messages, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Bot detection scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Messages
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional
  2. Content focuses on connecting businesses with digital marketing agencies
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. Security practices are basic but include HTTPS and anti-spam measures
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.1.3 using the Astra theme and child theme, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS platform. The tech stack includes jQuery, Swiper.js for UI components, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, HubSpot for messaging and analytics, and CleanTalk for spam protection. The site loads multiple external scripts and fonts from trusted CDNs and services. Performance appears moderate with standard optimizations but could benefit from further caching and asset optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by the Astra theme and responsive design elements. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may impact load times and potential privacy concerns. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be optimized for speed and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moonfruit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moonfruit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.