Skip to main content

Security report for red.com

RED Digital Cinema, Inc. · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RED Digital Cinema, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of professional digital cinema cameras, offering advanced modular camera systems such as the V-RAPTOR and KOMODO lines. The company targets professional filmmakers and broadcast professionals, maintaining a strong market position through innovation in large format global shutter technology. Their business model focuses on direct sales, supported by a dealer network and educational resources. Technically, the website is built on SuiteCommerce Advanced hosted on AWS with strong branding and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with valid SSL certificates and strong security headers, though modern TLS protocols are not enabled and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. Privacy and terms policies exist but GDPR compliance is not explicitly stated. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching red.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RED Digital Cinema holds a competitive advantage in the professional cinema camera market through its innovative sensor technology and modular systems. Revenue streams likely include direct product sales, accessories, and educational programs. The company maintains a global dealer and service network, enhancing customer reach. Partnerships are managed via a dedicated partner portal, and support is centralized on a separate domain. The target customer segment is professional and enterprise-level filmmakers and broadcasters. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns, trade-in programs, and continuous product launches. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to maintain brand presence and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, HSTS enabled, and security headers like X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy properly configured. No vulnerable SSL/TLS protocols or known SSL vulnerabilities are detected. However, the absence of modern TLS versions (TLS 1.2/1.3) is a notable gap. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, representing an opportunity to strengthen domain security. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit GDPR compliance statements suggests potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with updated protocols and clearer policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to improve encryption security and compatibility.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance domain security and prevent certificate misuse.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on SuiteCommerce Advanced platform, leveraging AWS hosting and Akamai CDN for performance and reliability. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript, CSS, and integration with third-party services like Affirm for payments and Facebook Pixel for marketing. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization, though accessibility is basic. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of JSON-LD structured data limits semantic richness. Technical risks include outdated TLS protocol support and lack of DNSSEC, which could impact security and trust. The site shows low technical debt with opportunities for modernization in security protocols and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with red.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review red.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.