Skip to main content

Security report for doforms.com

doForms · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

doForms is a technology company specializing in mobile forms software and mobile data collection solutions designed to improve business operations across small to medium businesses and enterprises. The company offers a SaaS platform that includes mobile forms, data management, automated workflows, live dashboards, and extensive integrations with major applications. Positioned as an established provider with a broad customer base, doForms targets industries such as technology, energy, and transportation primarily in the United States. The website demonstrates excellent content quality, branding consistency, and trust indicators including customer reviews and partner logos. Technically, the website is built on WordPress hosted on WP Engine, utilizing modern technologies such as jQuery, WP Rocket for performance optimization, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and fast performance. Security-wise, the site has a valid SSL certificate but lacks enabled TLS protocols and HSTS, which are critical for secure communications. Security headers are present but could be enhanced with additional best practices. There is no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy visible, which could be a gap in security posture. Overall, doForms maintains a strong digital presence with good SEO and user experience, but should address TLS protocol support and security header enhancements to improve security posture. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security governance. Strategic recommendations include enabling modern TLS versions, implementing HSTS, adding security headers, and publishing clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 24 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching doforms.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
15
Email security
90
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

doForms operates in the SaaS market for mobile forms and data collection, serving a diverse client base including government, education, and global businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in customizable mobile forms, real-time data management, workflow automation, and broad integrations with platforms like Geotab, Salesforce, QuickBooks, and Microsoft. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and enterprise licensing. The company fosters partnerships and reseller programs to expand market reach. Growth indicators include continuous product enhancements such as the WorkFORCE platform and integration marketplace. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and strong customer testimonials, supporting a high trust level in the market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of doForms is moderate. The website uses a valid SSL certificate but does not enable any TLS protocols, which is a significant security concern that could expose users to insecure connections. The absence of HSTS and DNSSEC reduces protection against certain attack vectors. Security headers are partially implemented but lack advanced protections like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is indicated via privacy policy, but no explicit data protection officer contact is found. Overall, the security culture appears basic with room for improvement in technical controls and governance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols to secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Configure DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security.
  5. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  6. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file.
  7. Enhance cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party integrations and plugins for security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform hosted by WP Engine, leveraging nginx as the web server. It uses modern front-end technologies including jQuery and lazy loading for images and videos to optimize performance. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is optimized with WP Rocket caching and minification. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is incomplete with no TLS versions enabled, which is a critical technical risk. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Technical debt appears low but security configuration gaps present modernization opportunities. Integration with multiple external services and marketing tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with doforms.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review doforms.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.