Skip to main content

Security report for senseiai.me

Sensei AI · Technology

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sensei AI is a technology company specializing in AI-powered interview assistance tools designed to provide real-time, invisible guidance during live and mock interviews. Their flagship product, Sensei AI Copilot, supports multiple interview types including coding, behavioral, and system design, offering personalized answers based on user resumes and job descriptions. The company positions itself as a niche player in the AI interview assistant market with a subscription-based business model and a focus on seamless integration with popular interview platforms. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like Astro and integrates various analytics and user engagement tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though the absence of explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-focused experience with clear business credibility and technical sophistication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 3 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga_P75ZJ4W4GK, _ga); Google (_gcl_au). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      senseiai.me publishes no SPF record, so receiving servers cannot tell which servers may send mail as this domain.

      What to do: Publish one TXT record listing your mail providers, for example "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourprovider.com -all". A domain that sends no mail should publish "v=spf1 -all".

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.senseiai.me, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.senseiai.me, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@senseiai.me" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching senseiai.me

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
65
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
75
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention senseiai.me, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for senseiai.me right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sensei AI targets job candidates preparing for technical and behavioral interviews, offering a competitive advantage through real-time, undetectable AI assistance. Their business model relies on subscription plans with a free trial to attract users. The company maintains a partnership with Linkjob AI, as indicated by a migration notice, suggesting strategic collaboration or transition. The product supports a wide range of interview platforms and programming languages, appealing to a global audience. The presence of detailed FAQs, video testimonials, and social media engagement (Discord) enhances customer trust and community building. The company operates in the technology sector with a small-sized organizational footprint, focusing on innovation in AI-driven recruitment tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness from a security governance perspective. No dedicated security contact channels were found. The use of third-party analytics and chat services introduces moderate tracking but appears managed responsibly. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security team to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sensei AI
Description
Sensei AI Copilot offers real-time interview answers, coding support, personalized guidance and private phone viewing. It is an AI interview assistant designed to provide invisible, real-time AI guidance during live interviews and coding assessments.
Key services
Real-time AI interview assistance, Coding support and screenshot analysis, Personalized answers based on resume and job description, Dual-device viewing mode
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro, JavaScript, YouTube embeds, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Crisp Chat, Clarity (Microsoft), IntersectionObserver API
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
macOS, Windows, Linux
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Crisp Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered interview assistance with real-time, undetectable overlay technology.
  3. Comprehensive FAQ and video testimonials enhance trust and user understanding.
  4. Multiple supported platforms and detailed setup guides indicate mature product support.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools for performance and user insights.
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy documents beyond standard privacy and terms pages.
  7. No direct phone contact information found; contact primarily via email and Discord community.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Astro framework, leveraging modern JavaScript and web standards for fast loading and excellent mobile optimization. It integrates multiple analytics platforms (Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager) and user engagement tools like Crisp Chat. The site uses video embeds and interactive UI components to enhance user experience. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but performance indicators suggest a well-configured environment. Accessibility features and SEO optimizations are present, contributing to a professional and user-friendly site. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with senseiai.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review senseiai.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.