Image to Image · Technology
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
Image to Image is a specialized AI-driven image editing platform that allows users to transform existing photos using text prompts. The service targets both individual users and businesses seeking creative image restyling, product photo enhancement, and avatar creation. The platform operates on a subscription and credit-based model, offering multiple tiers to accommodate different usage levels. Technically, the website is built with modern web technologies, likely leveraging React or a similar framework, and integrates multiple analytics services for performance and marketing insights. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a secure third-party payment processor (Waffo), but could improve by adding explicit security headers and publishing a security policy. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with a solid technical foundation.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Without HSTS, a visitor who types the address or follows an http:// link makes a first request over plain HTTP, which an attacker on the same network can intercept and keep unencrypted (SSL stripping).
What to do: Send "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" on HTTPS responses once every subdomain works over HTTPS (use max-age=31536000 alone otherwise).
No Content-Security-Policy is set, so if an attacker manages to inject a script (cross-site scripting), the browser runs it with full access to the page.
What to do: Start with "Content-Security-Policy: object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'" and add a script-src that lists your script origins or uses nonces. Test with a Report-Only header first.
Other websites can load your pages inside an invisible frame and trick visitors into clicking buttons on them (clickjacking).
What to do: Send "Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'" (or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN for older browsers).
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
The server still accepts TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.0, deprecated by RFC 8996. Modern browsers no longer use them, but they let outdated clients connect with weak cryptography.
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0 and 1.1; keep TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 (in CDN dashboards this is the "minimum TLS version" setting).
This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention imagetoimage.tools, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for imagetoimage.tools right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with imagetoimage.tools. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imagetoimage.tools.