Skip to main content

Security report for artcraft.tools

ArtCraft · Technology

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ArtCraft is a technology company offering a comprehensive web-based creative studio that integrates manual image editing, 3D scene composition, video editing, and AI-powered generation and editing tools. The platform targets creative professionals and digital artists seeking an all-in-one solution for multimedia content creation. The business model is credit-based, allowing users to access AI features through purchased credits, positioning ArtCraft as an innovative player in the AI-driven creative tools market. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React, Tailwind CSS, and SVG icons, with performance optimizations such as module preloading and responsive design. SEO and accessibility are well addressed, and the site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. The infrastructure appears robust and optimized for fast, mobile-friendly user experiences. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and shows signs of good security practices, though explicit security headers and policies are not visible in the provided data. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. Overall, ArtCraft presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong technical foundations and a clear business focus. To enhance security posture and compliance, it is recommended to publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, establish a vulnerability disclosure program, and provide clear incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 2 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga, _ga_L20TP5MYSV). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.artcraft.tools, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.artcraft.tools, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@artcraft.tools" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artcraft.tools

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
75
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
75
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention artcraft.tools, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for artcraft.tools right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ArtCraft operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting the creative multimedia market with AI-enhanced tools. Its credit-based SaaS model enables monetization through AI generation and editing services. The platform's integration of image, video, and 3D editing positions it competitively against niche and generalist creative tools. The presence of trending and creative tool categories suggests active content and feature updates, supporting user engagement and growth. Partnerships or integrations with AI and video generation services are implied by external links but not explicitly detailed. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, appealing to digital artists and creative professionals seeking advanced AI capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible security flaws or exposed data. Use of modern JavaScript modules and absence of inline scripts reduce attack surface. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. The site uses Google Tag Manager, which requires careful management to avoid privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a visible security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  4. Audit and document third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing business contact details including phone and physical address if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ArtCraft
Description
Create with ArtCraft: compose images, stage 3D scenes, edit video and organize references in one web studio. AI generation, AI editing and character training use credits.
Key services
Manual image editing and drawing, 3D scene composition, Video timelines and editing, AI image, video, audio, mesh and world generation, AI video background editing and character training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Tailwind CSS, SVG icons, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JavaScript modules
  • No inline scripts detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional creative studio platform integrating AI tools.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Contact email is provided in structured data but no phone or physical address found.
  4. Modern web technologies and good SEO practices observed.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack centered on React and Tailwind CSS, with modular JavaScript loading for performance. The design is responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, indicating a data-driven approach. Hosting details are not explicit but performance indicators suggest a reliable provider. No CMS is detected, implying a custom or static site generation approach. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies and security headers is advised to maintain robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artcraft.tools. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artcraft.tools.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.