Skip to main content

Security report for dola-ai.com

Dola AI · Technology

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dola AI is a technology company specializing in AI-powered creative tools that enable users to generate and edit images, videos, 3D scenes, and office documents such as spreadsheets and PDFs. The platform operates on a credit-based model, targeting creative professionals and businesses seeking advanced multimedia generation capabilities. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks, Three.js for 3D rendering, and integration of analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and offers clear navigation across a broad suite of AI tools and models. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies are absent. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the platform appears legitimate and professionally managed, but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 2 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga, _ga_JGH3V38E60). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.dola-ai.com, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.dola-ai.com, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@dola-ai.com" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dola-ai.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
53
Email security
75
DNS health
94
Network security
100
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
75
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dola-ai.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dola-ai.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dola AI positions itself as a niche player in the AI creative tools market, offering a comprehensive suite of services that span image, video, 3D, and document editing powered by AI. Its credit-based business model suggests a SaaS revenue stream targeting individual creators and enterprises. The presence of multiple AI models and tools indicates a strong technical capability and a broad partnership ecosystem, including references to brands like OpenAI and Google in model names. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and structured data for SEO. However, the lack of detailed company registration data and physical contact information limits full business transparency. The platform's growth potential is supported by its extensive toolset and modern infrastructure.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which is a potential area for improvement. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a moderate security maturity level. The site uses reputable analytics services but lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by adopting best practices such as security headers, transparency in incident response, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance contact information by including phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dola AI
Description
Create with Dola AI: generate images and videos, edit photos and films, compose 3D scenes, and work with documents, spreadsheets, slides and PDFs. AI generation uses credits.
Key services
AI image generation, AI video generation and editing, 3D scene composition, Document, spreadsheet, slide, and PDF editing, Credit-based usage model
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Three.js (3D rendering), Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Likely React or similar modern JS framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers a comprehensive suite of AI-powered creative tools for images, video, 3D, and office documents.
  2. The site is well-structured with extensive navigation menus categorizing tools by media type and AI models.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies are found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is limited to an email address in structured data; no phone or physical address found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies are published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, likely React or similar, with module preloading and hydration techniques for performance. It integrates Three.js for 3D rendering capabilities and uses Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance appears fast with preloaded images and scripts. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical implementation is robust but could benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dola-ai.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dola-ai.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.