Skip to main content

Security report for br.com

.BR.COM · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website br.com operates as a specialized domain registry offering the .BR.COM domain namespace, targeting businesses and entrepreneurs seeking an unrestricted digital identity in Brazil. It positions itself as a premium alternative to the traditional .com.br domains by providing global accessibility without local regulatory restrictions. The business model revolves around domain registration services facilitated through partnerships with major registrars such as GoDaddy and Namecheap, with support services managed by Gen.xyz. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation, domain search functionality, and a focus on brand trust and market visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 5 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_gid, _gat_UA-263776482-1, _ga_6PED8PDW5M, _ga). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.br.com, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.br.com, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@br.com" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

  3. Website hygiene

    Outdated scripts and CMS versions are how most small-business sites get compromised; a security.txt file tells researchers where to report what they find.

    • High

      Outdated JavaScript library with known vulnerabilities

      underscore.js 1.8.3 (detected in the page) has 2 published vulnerabilities: CVE-2021-23358, GHSA-cf4h-3jhx-xvhq, CVE-2026-27601, GHSA-qpx9-hpmf-5gmw.

      What to do: Upgrade underscore.js to 1.13.8 or later and retest the pages that use it.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching br.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
53
Email security
80
DNS health
98
Network security
100
Website hygiene
75
GDPR outside view
75
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention br.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
168,258
Employees
35
Customers
166,594
Third parties
1,629
Weak passwords
20%

Latest record dated 2026-10-06 · 2,336 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for br.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –girorapidoclassificados.com.br.com2026-10-06
  • –live.com.br.com2026-10-06
  • –encanto.br.com2026-10-06
  • –br.com2026-10-06
  • –land.br.com2026-10-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

br.com holds a niche market position as an alternative Brazilian domain provider with a unique selling proposition of unrestricted domain availability. Its competitive advantage lies in offering premium, brandable domain names with fewer restrictions compared to local ccTLDs. The target customers include startups, established companies, and global brands expanding into Brazil. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable registrars and domain service providers, enhancing credibility and reach. The business appears to be small-sized, US-based, and has been operational for over a decade, indicating stability and experience in the domain registration market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. It employs modern analytics and tag management tools, indicating digital maturity. However, it lacks visible security policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and cookie consent banners, which are important for compliance and transparency. Incident response and abuse handling are outsourced to Gen.xyz, a trusted domain services provider, which strengthens its security incident management. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adding explicit policies and compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent mechanism to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and security posture.
  3. Add accessibility improvements to meet broader compliance standards and improve user experience.
  4. Include direct company contact emails or phone numbers to increase business credibility and user confidence.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security certifications or trust seals to boost trust indicators.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
.BR.COM
Description
Provides an unrestricted, globally accessible domain namespace for Brazil under the .BR.COM domain, targeting businesses and entrepreneurs seeking premium domain names without local restrictions.
Key services
Domain registration, Domain search and availability, Support and abuse handling via Gen.xyz
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap Grid, jQuery 3.5.1, Underscore.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers a niche domain registration service targeting Brazil with a .BR.COM domain.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear calls to action and domain search functionality.
  3. No explicit privacy cookie banner or consent mechanism found, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  4. Contact and abuse reporting handled via Gen.xyz, a reputable domain services provider.
  5. Use of modern analytics and tag management tools indicates digital maturity.
  6. No visible security policy or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  7. No phone numbers or direct company emails listed on the site; contact is via forms and external Gen.xyz links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap Grid, jQuery, and Underscore.js. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and compliance features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with br.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review br.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.