Skip to main content

Security report for mod-pls.com

MOD Corp · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MOD Corp is a medium-sized company specializing in power, charging, and lighting solutions, serving both B2B and B2C markets. With over 25 years of experience, MOD offers a broad range of products including custom power solutions, LED lighting, and wire management, supported by a robust e-commerce platform powered by WordPress and WooCommerce. The company maintains an active online presence with social media engagement and a partner program to grow its business network. Technically, the website is well-structured with modern web technologies and optimized for performance and SEO, though there is room for improvement in security protocols and headers. Security posture is solid with valid SSL and Cloudflare protection, but lacks advanced TLS support and a published security policy or incident response plan. Overall, MOD demonstrates a professional and trustworthy digital presence with good compliance to privacy regulations such as GDPR.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mod-pls.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MOD Corp positions itself as a reliable supplier of innovative power and lighting products with a focus on scalability and affordability. The business model integrates direct e-commerce sales and partner collaborations, targeting commercial clients and end consumers. The company leverages digital marketing tools like HubSpot and Google Analytics for customer insights and engagement. Its product portfolio and manufacturing capabilities indicate a strong foothold in the energy and manufacturing sectors. The presence of a partner portal and detailed resource sections suggests a strategic emphasis on building long-term business relationships and knowledge sharing. The company’s consistent branding and quality content support its market credibility and growth potential.

Security posture

The website employs essential security headers and a valid SSL certificate, ensuring basic protection for users. However, the absence of HSTS and support for modern TLS protocols limits the security effectiveness. The content security policy is set to report-only mode, which reduces its protective impact. No explicit security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is well-implemented with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy. The lack of a security.txt file and data protection officer contact details suggests opportunities to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from strategic improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Upgrade server TLS configuration to support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 for stronger encryption.
  3. Enforce a strict Content Security Policy rather than report-only to mitigate XSS risks.
  4. Restrict Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to trusted domains instead of wildcard '*'.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MOD Corp
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, enhanced by plugins such as Gravity Forms and GDPR Cookie Compliance. It uses Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services, improving performance and security. The tech stack includes jQuery, Swiper for sliders, GSAP for animations, and Yoast SEO for search optimization. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot and Google Analytics, supporting data-driven decision making. Technical debt appears low, but security configurations require modernization to mitigate risks and comply with evolving standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mod-pls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mod-pls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.