Skip to main content

Security report for akerbp.com

Aker BP ASA · Energy · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aker BP ASA is a leading Norwegian oil and gas company focused on exploration, development, and production on the Norwegian continental shelf. It holds a strong market position as one of Europe's largest independent publicly listed oil companies. The website provides comprehensive information about its operations, investor relations, sustainability efforts, and career opportunities, targeting investors, partners, suppliers, and job seekers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA, and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with minor improvements recommended in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency to enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
80/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
62/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      The page loads Google, but no privacy or cookie policy link was found to name these recipients.

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Route Fails RPKI Validation

      The internet route to name server a.portsdns.se (45.54.35.101, 45.54.35.101/32 from AS63911) conflicts with the published ROAs (AS63911 45.54.35.0/24 max /24). Networks that enforce RPKI, including most large transit providers, drop such routes, so part of the internet may not reach the server; an unexpected origin can also mean the route is hijacked.

      What to do: Ask the provider that holds the address block to correct its ROA (origin AS and maximum prefix length) or to stop announcing the conflicting route.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akerbp.com

This scan found 17 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
95
DNS health
80
Network security
100
Website hygiene
90
GDPR outside view
62
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention akerbp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
130
Employees
17
Customers
32
Third parties
81
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2026-09-22 · 17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for akerbp.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.akerbp.com2026-09-22
  • –an.lci.akerbp.com2026-09-22
  • –intranett.akerbp.com2026-09-22
  • –academy.akerbp.com2026-09-22
  • –adfs.akerbp.com2026-09-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aker BP operates in the energy sector with a focus on oil and gas production in Norway. Its business model centers on exploration, field development, and production, supported by strong investor relations and sustainability initiatives. The company targets institutional investors, industry partners, suppliers, and potential employees. The website reflects a well-established brand with consistent messaging and a comprehensive content strategy. Partnerships with technology providers and service platforms like Headspin and OneVoice indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The presence of a financial calendar and press releases signals transparency and active market engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting user inputs. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No signs of exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were found. The site uses nonce tokens in forms, indicating awareness of CSRF protection. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aker BP ASA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aker BP ASA
Description
Aker BP er et oljeselskap som leter, utvikler felt og produserer olje og gass på den norske kontinentalsokkelen. Selskapet er operatør for feltsentrene Valhall, Ula, Edvard Grieg/Ivar Aasen, Alvheim og Skarv, og medeier i Johan Sverdrup-feltet.
Key services
Oil and gas exploration, Field development, Production operations, Carbon capture and storage (CCS), Technology proposals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Chart.js, NoUISlider, Headspin AI Search, 3D Flipbook plugin, AddEvent calendar integration
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in subscription form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Headspin Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Headspin Analytics
Marketing tools
AddEvent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to the oil and gas sector.
  3. Strong investor relations and corporate governance information present.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Limited explicit privacy and security policy disclosures.
  7. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  8. Social media presence on major platforms is active.
  9. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and diverse technology stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Chart.js for data visualization. It integrates third-party services such as Headspin Analytics and AddEvent for enhanced functionality. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) implemented. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed and resource management. The technical infrastructure supports a professional corporate presence but would benefit from improved security header implementation and enhanced privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akerbp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akerbp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.