Skip to main content

Security report for routledge.com

Routledge · Education · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Routledge is a leading academic and professional book publisher, operating under the Taylor & Francis Group. The website serves scholars, instructors, and professionals by providing access to a wide range of academic and professional publications. The company holds a strong market position in the education and publishing sectors, with a business model focused on content creation, distribution, and e-commerce. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to enhance user engagement and business intelligence. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. Hosting and security are reinforced by Cloudflare services, including Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The site demonstrates good performance, SEO, and basic accessibility features, although there is room for improvement in accessibility and explicit security policy disclosures. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers such as CSP and X-Frame-Options. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR adherence. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust. Overall, Routledge's website reflects a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and security posture. The lack of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection and does not detract from the legitimacy of the site. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and enhancing accessibility to further strengthen the site’s trustworthiness and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of routledge.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching routledge.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention routledge.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,709
Employees
0
Customers
2,671
Third parties
38
Weak passwords
8%

12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for routledge.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Routledge operates as a major player in the academic publishing industry, targeting scholars, educators, and professionals globally. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive catalog and association with the Taylor & Francis Group. Revenue streams primarily come from book sales and digital content distribution. The company leverages partnerships such as authors.taylorandfrancis.com to engage with content creators. Growth indicators include the integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement and market expansion. The company maintains a consistent brand image and invests in compliance and user experience enhancements, positioning itself strongly in the education sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and bot mitigation via Cloudflare Turnstile. Privacy compliance is well-managed through OneTrust cookie consent and GDPR adherence. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program represents gaps in transparency and incident readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and formalized incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards and compliance.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Taylor & Francis Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Routledge
Description
Routledge is a leading book publisher that fosters human progress through knowledge for scholars, instructors and professionals.
Key services
Academic book publishing, Professional book publishing, E-commerce for books
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, FontAwesome, ContentSquare, Optimizely
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, ContentSquare, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
ContentSquare, Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional academic publishing site with clear branding
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Google Tag Manager for analytics management. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare, providing CDN and security services. Performance optimizations include preloading key assets and fonts, and deferred loading of non-critical scripts. The site integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms such as ContentSquare and Optimizely, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Technical debt appears minimal, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site is well-structured for SEO with appropriate meta tags and canonical URLs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 78/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with routledge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review routledge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

routledge.com security report: 73/100, medium risk | Guard