Skip to main content

Security report for augstskola.lv

Ekonomikas un Kultūras augstskola · Education · Latvia

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ekonomikas un Kultūras augstskola (EKA) is a Latvian higher education institution providing a broad range of study programs in economics, culture, business, law, IT, and design. The website presents a professional and content-rich platform targeting prospective students with detailed program information, flexible study options including distance learning, and scholarship opportunities. The institution maintains a moderate international presence through Erasmus+ and research collaborations. Technically, the website uses a custom stack with jQuery, Font Awesome, and third-party embedded forms from Zoho, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie and privacy notices. Overall, the domain registration data aligns with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
80/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
97/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Without HSTS, a visitor who types the address or follows an http:// link makes a first request over plain HTTP, which an attacker on the same network can intercept and keep unencrypted (SSL stripping).

      What to do: Send "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" on HTTPS responses once every subdomain works over HTTPS (use max-age=31536000 alone otherwise).

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • Medium

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      No Content-Security-Policy is set, so if an attacker manages to inject a script (cross-site scripting), the browser runs it with full access to the page.

      What to do: Start with "Content-Security-Policy: object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'" and add a script-src that lists your script origins or uses nonces. Test with a Report-Only header first.

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
    • Medium

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Other websites can load your pages inside an invisible frame and trick visitors into clicking buttons on them (clickjacking).

      What to do: Send "Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'" (or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN for older browsers).

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Medium

      Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP, Pure-FTPd) is reachable from the internet. FTP sends logins and files unencrypted and is a frequent brute-force target.

      What to do: Block port 21 at the firewall and reach FTP through a VPN or private network instead.

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Website hygiene

    Outdated scripts and CMS versions are how most small-business sites get compromised; a security.txt file tells researchers where to report what they find.

    • Medium

      Outdated JavaScript library with known vulnerabilities

      jquery 1.11.0 (detected in the page) has 5 published vulnerabilities: CVE-2015-9251, GHSA-rmxg-73gg-4p98, CVE-2019-11358, GHSA-6c3j-c64m-qhgq, CVE-2020-11023, GHSA-jpcq-cgw6-v4j6.

      What to do: Upgrade jquery to 3.5.0 or later and retest the pages that use it.

Keep watching augstskola.lv

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
53
Email security
97
DNS health
94
Network security
85
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
97
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention augstskola.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
625
Employees
0
Customers
622
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
62%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for augstskola.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EKA occupies a stable position in the Latvian private higher education sector, offering diverse academic programs and emphasizing a dynamic, creative student lifestyle. Its business model focuses on tuition-based education with additional funding support via grants and scholarships. The institution targets young adults and professionals seeking flexible study formats. Partnerships with other colleges and participation in Erasmus+ enhance its market reach. The website's content and structure reflect a mature digital presence, supporting recruitment and community engagement. Growth indicators include active research, alumni success stories, and international collaborations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy and anti-CSRF protections in forms. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of security incidents. The use of third-party embedded forms and tracking pixels introduces moderate privacy and security considerations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ekonomikas un Kultūras augstskola
Description
Ekonomikas un kultūras augstskola (EKA) is a Latvian higher education institution offering bachelor, master, and college level programs in economics, culture, business, law, IT, design, and related fields. It emphasizes a dynamic, creative lifestyle and offers flexible study schedules including distance learning.
Key services
Bachelor and Master degree programs, College programs, Distance learning, Grants and scholarships, Erasmus+ international exchange, Research and scientific activities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Highslide JS, Arctic Modal, Zoho Forms (embedded), Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Login form with password field
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on education and student engagement
  3. Good compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements
  4. Use of multiple external trusted services for forms and analytics
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No explicit terms of service found
  7. Contact information is present but physical address is not explicitly shown in the provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built platform with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome, supplemented by third-party services like Zoho Forms for data collection and Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript techniques. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident. The technical debt appears manageable but would benefit from modernization of libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 47/100High30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with augstskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review augstskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.