Skip to main content

Security report for edy365.com

edy365.com · Education · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

edy365.com is a Latvian-based SaaS platform specializing in digital practice management for educational institutions and companies. The platform offers end-to-end solutions including contract signing, work tracking, and automated reporting, serving over 2000 companies and 30+ educational institutions. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent, though some security policy documentation is missing. Overall, the site reflects a mature business with a solid market position in Latvia's education sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
80/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
67/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set before consent

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (consent banner), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Google Analytics (_ga_71NNGCNYR2, _ga).

      What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.

    • High

      Tracking continues after "Reject all"

      Guard opened the site in a separate, fresh browser profile, refused consent ("Es noraidu" button) as a visitor would, then reloaded the page. These analytics or marketing cookies were set after the refusal: Google Analytics (_ga, _ga_71NNGCNYR2). Requests also went to Google (www.google.de); Google Marketing (stats.g.doubleclick.net). Storing them after a refusal has no consent basis under ePrivacy Art. 5(3); the CNIL fined Yahoo EUR 10 million in December 2023 for advertising cookies placed al…

      What to do: Tie every tag to its consent category in the consent platform or tag manager so it stays blocked after a refusal, then repeat the check: reject, reload, and confirm no analytics or marketing cookies appear.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edy365.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
53
Email security
97
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
67
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention edy365.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
725
Employees
0
Customers
725
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for edy365.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

edy365.com targets educational institutions and companies needing digital practice management solutions. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS, focusing on streamlining internship and practice workflows. The platform demonstrates strong market penetration in Latvia, supported by numerous client logos and usage statistics. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains GDPR compliance, positioning itself as a trusted provider in the education technology space. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and multiple security headers, indicating a good security baseline. Cookie consent and privacy policy demonstrate GDPR awareness. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and incident response preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit contact emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Develop and publish terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
edy365.com
Description
Platforma digitalizētai prakses pārvaldībai. Pilns process – no attiecību nodibināšanas un līguma parakstīšanas, līdz darba uzskaitei un automatizētām atskaitēm. Piedāvā pakalpojumus uzņēmumiem un izglītības iestādēm.
Key services
Digitāla prakses pārvaldība, Līgumu parakstīšana, Darba uzskaite, Automatizētas atskaites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with English alternate version.
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder.
  4. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact form available.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. Good SEO and social media integration absent or minimal.
  8. Strong branding and client trust signals visible.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

edy365.com is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for metadata and structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with optimized images and lazy loading. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility basics. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but SSL and security headers indicate a professionally managed environment. Technical risks are low, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected in the provided HTML.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edy365.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edy365.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.