Skip to main content

Security report for jak.lv

Redirects to www.jttehnikums.lv; the website checks ran on that page, the DNS and email checks on jak.lv.

Jēkabpils Tehnoloģiju tehnikums · Education · Latvia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Network security.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jēkabpils Tehnoloģiju tehnikums is a Latvian vocational and secondary education institution operating under the Ministry of Education and Science. The website serves as an informational portal for prospective and current students, highlighting educational programs in technology, commerce, and logistics. The institution maintains a professional web presence with modern technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and a CMS named KPanel 3. The site is mobile-optimized and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy, reflecting good privacy practices. However, explicit contact information and terms of service are not present in the provided content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacking visible security headers or detailed security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, suitable for its educational purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
97/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL, MariaDB 11.4.13) is reachable from the internet. The database accepts connections from the whole internet; only its password stands in the way.

      What to do: Block port 3306 at the firewall and reach MySQL through a VPN or private network instead.

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jak.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
95
DNS health
94
Network security
45
Website hygiene
70
GDPR outside view
97
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jak.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
701
Employees
1
Customers
9
Third parties
691
Weak passwords
2%

Latest record dated 2026-10-06 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jak.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –jak.lv2026-10-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution targets students seeking vocational and secondary education in technology and commerce sectors within Latvia. Its business model is public education funded and regulated by the government. The website supports brand consistency moderately and leverages partnerships with structural units represented by subdomains. The absence of commercial advertising and affiliate programs aligns with its public service nature. Growth indicators and market positioning are stable within the regional education sector. The digital presence supports student engagement but could improve with more direct contact channels and expanded policy disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party libraries is modern but requires regular auditing to mitigate risks. The absence of contact emails or phone numbers limits incident reporting capabilities. Overall, security maturity is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting best practices such as CSP headers, security.txt files, and explicit security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance legal and security compliance.
  4. Include explicit contact information such as official emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jēkabpils Tehnoloģiju tehnikums
Description
Jēkabpils Tehnoloģiju tehnikums ir Izglītības un Zinātnes ministrijas tiešās padotības profesionālās pamata un vidējās izglītības iestāde.
Key services
vocational education, secondary education, programming, computer systems, cybersecurity, commerce, accounting, logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Popper.js, Font Awesome, FullCalendar, Fancybox
Frameworks
KPanel 3 (CMS)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained.
  2. Clear cookie consent and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage HTML provided.
  4. No terms of service or security policy documents found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Cookie policy is detailed and includes categorization of cookies.
  8. Social media links are not present or not detected in the provided HTML.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  10. No visible forms for contact or data collection except cookie consent customization form.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Popper.js, and Font Awesome, managed via the KPanel 3 CMS. External resources are loaded from trusted CDNs. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No signs of technical debt or deprecated technologies were found. The cookie consent implementation is robust and user-friendly, supporting GDPR compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jak.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jak.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.