Skip to main content

Security report for tomillo.org

Fundación Tomillo · Education · Spain

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fundación Tomillo is a well-established Spanish non-profit organization focused on empowering children and youth from vulnerable backgrounds through comprehensive education and vocational training. With over 40 years of experience, it offers a range of services including regulated vocational training, employment support, school dropout prevention, personal development, and social innovation. The foundation maintains a strong digital presence and collaborates with notable partners such as Microsoft and Ferrovial to enhance its educational offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility practices, supported by analytics and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. Security measures are robust, featuring HTTPS, security headers, and secure forms, although formal incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available. Overall, the foundation demonstrates high business credibility and digital maturity, with a secure and user-friendly online platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
59/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set before consent

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (consent banner), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Google (_gcl_au); Google Analytics (_ga, _ga_J4RR997QJG); LinkedIn (bcookie, lidc); Facebook (_fbp).

      What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.

    • High

      Tracking continues after "Reject all"

      Guard opened the site in a separate, fresh browser profile, refused consent ("Rechazar" button) as a visitor would, then reloaded the page. These analytics or marketing cookies were set after the refusal: Google (_gcl_au); Google Analytics (_ga, _ga_J4RR997QJG); LinkedIn (bcookie, lidc); Facebook (_fbp). Requests also went to LinkedIn Ads (px.ads.linkedin.com); Google (region1.analytics.google.com); Google Marketing (stats.g.doubleclick.net); Facebook (www.facebook.com); Microsoft Clarity (i.cl…

      What to do: Tie every tag to its consent category in the consent platform or tag manager so it stays blocked after a refusal, then repeat the check: reject, reload, and confirm no analytics or marketing cookies appear.

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL, MySQL 8.4.11-11) is reachable from the internet. The database accepts connections from the whole internet; only its password stands in the way.

      What to do: Block port 3306 at the firewall and reach MySQL through a VPN or private network instead.

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL DB 9.6.0 or later) is reachable from the internet. The database accepts connections from the whole internet; only its password stands in the way.

      What to do: Block port 5432 at the firewall and reach PostgreSQL through a VPN or private network instead.

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tomillo.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
58
Email security
82
DNS health
95
Network security
35
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
59
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tomillo.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
39
Employees
2
Customers
9
Third parties
28
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-12-20 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tomillo.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –webmail.tomillo.org2025-12-20
  • –webmail.tomillo.org2025-10-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a strong position in the social and educational sector in Spain, targeting vulnerable youth and educational stakeholders. Its business model is non-profit, relying on donations, partnerships, and social programs. The organization leverages partnerships with technology and infrastructure companies to expand its impact. The website content and structure reflect a professional and transparent approach, with clear calls to action for donations, volunteering, and corporate collaboration. Growth indicators include innovative programs like the Data Center Academy and podcasts on socio-educational innovation. The foundation's ecosystem includes social media channels and a multilingual website, enhancing outreach and engagement.

Security posture

Fundación Tomillo's website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of CAPTCHA for form security. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and lack of explicit incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. The site complies with GDPR requirements, including cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies. Regular audits and security policy disclosures are present, indicating a proactive security culture. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of security policies and certifications on the website to build user trust.
  5. Consider adopting formal security frameworks such as ISO 27001 or NIST to strengthen governance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundación Tomillo
Description
Fundación Tomillo is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing children and young people from vulnerable environments with opportunities for access to comprehensive and quality education. They develop regulated vocational training and specialized employment training.
Key services
Vocational training, Employment accompaniment, School dropout prevention, Personal development and leadership, Research and evaluation, Internationalization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Contact Form 7, Advanced Custom Fields Pro, Slick Slider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with reCAPTCHA v3

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Site Kit by Google
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and professionally presented
  3. Strong social media presence across major platforms
  4. Good implementation of SEO and accessibility best practices
  5. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via forms and social media
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress with a child theme of GeneratePress, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Advanced Custom Fields Pro. It employs modern front-end libraries like jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, integrated through Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of images and scripts. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tomillo.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tomillo.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.