Skip to main content

Security report for one.com

one.com · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

one.com is a well-established technology company specializing in domain registration, web hosting, email services, and website building tools. The company targets small businesses, entrepreneurs, bloggers, and individuals seeking reliable and affordable online presence solutions. With millions of customers and a broad service portfolio including WordPress hosting, e-commerce, VPS, and marketing tools, one.com holds a strong market position in the web services industry, particularly in Finland and other European markets. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure leveraging WordPress CMS, modern JavaScript frameworks, and third-party integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, providing an excellent user experience with clear navigation and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with SSL certificates included in all hosting packages, daily backups, malware scanning options, and domain lock features. However, there is a lack of publicly disclosed formal security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhancing trust and compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally managed, with strong branding and customer support channels. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to privacy or registry policies rather than malicious intent. Strategic improvements in security transparency and direct contact information could further strengthen the company's security posture and customer confidence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of one.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching one.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

one.com operates a subscription-based business model offering domain registration, web hosting, and digital services. Its competitive advantages include a comprehensive product suite, 24/7 customer support, and strong brand recognition. Revenue streams derive from hosting plans, domain sales, add-ons like SiteLock and SEO tools, and managed WordPress services. The company targets SMEs, entrepreneurs, and bloggers, with growth indicators seen in product diversification and international language support. Partnerships with service providers like Trustpilot and Cookiebot enhance credibility. The company maintains a robust online presence with dedicated support and career portals, indicating operational maturity and market presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level of one.com is moderate to high, with enforced HTTPS, SSL certificates, daily backups, and malware scanning add-ons. The site uses modern consent management tools aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure program represents compliance gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The company should consider publishing formal security documentation and security.txt files to improve transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced communication and policy disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide direct security contact information (e.g., security@one.com) for incident reporting.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance by regularly updating cookie and data protection notices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
one.com
Description
Kattavalla ratkaisullamme voit luoda upean sivuston ja kasvattaa liiketoimintaasi verkossa. Rekisteröi verkkotunnus! Oma sähköposti, SSL, 24/7-tuki ja muuta.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting (Webhotelli), Email services, Website Builder, WordPress hosting, E-commerce solutions, Virtual private servers (VPS), Marketing and security tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress CMS, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, Cookiebot, Trustpilot widget, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web hosting platform by one.com
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SSL certificates included for all hosting packages
  • Daily backups
  • Malware scanning with SiteLock add-on
  • Domain lock protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Google Ads, marketgoo SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding and consistent professional design.
  3. Comprehensive product and service offerings in web hosting and domains.
  4. Multiple language support and localized content for Finland.
  5. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies with consent management.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact primarily via support portal and contact forms.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious for a large commercial domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks and third-party integrations for analytics, optimization, and consent management. Performance is optimized with CDN usage and lazy loading of assets. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD FAQ schema). Technical risks are minimal, but the site could improve by implementing additional security headers and formalizing security documentation. The infrastructure appears robust and scalable, supporting a large customer base with diverse product offerings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 −3Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 74/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with one.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review one.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.