Skip to main content

Security report for one.com

one.com · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

one.com is a well-established web hosting and domain registration provider targeting primarily the Finnish market with localized content and services. The company offers a comprehensive suite of products including domain registration, web hosting, email services, website building tools, WordPress hosting, e-commerce solutions, and marketing/security tools. Their market position is strong, supported by extensive customer testimonials and trust signals such as Trustpilot reviews and SSL certificates. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript and CSS technologies, integrating various analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, daily backups, malware scanning, and domain lock features, though some advanced security headers and explicit security policies are missing. Privacy compliance is robust with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to registry restrictions, which slightly reduces trust but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional web presence and external trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching one.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
45
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

one.com operates as a large technology company specializing in web hosting and domain services, catering to small businesses, entrepreneurs, and individuals. Their business model revolves around subscription-based hosting packages with tiered offerings to suit different customer needs, including beginners and growing enterprises. Revenue streams include domain registrations, hosting fees, add-on services like SSL certificates, email hosting, and marketing tools. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem evident from related domains and integrated third-party services. Growth indicators include a broad product portfolio, localized content, and active customer support channels. Strategic observations highlight a focus on ease of use, customer education via an academy, and continuous product updates.

Security posture

The security maturity level of one.com is good, with foundational best practices implemented such as HTTPS, SSL certificates, daily backups, and malware scanning through SiteLock. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies and consent management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The security culture appears customer-focused with 24/7 support availability but could benefit from enhanced communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and customer trust.
  2. Add advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information availability by including verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
one.com
Description
Kattavalla ratkaisullamme voit luoda upean sivuston ja kasvattaa liiketoimintaasi verkossa. Rekisteröi verkkotunnus! Oma sähköposti, SSL, 24/7-tuki ja muuta.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting (Webhotelli), Email services, Website Builder, WordPress hosting, E-commerce solutions, Virtual private servers (VPS), Marketing and security tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, Trustpilot widget, Cookiebot, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
WordPress (CMS), Website Builder platform
Platforms
Web hosting platform, Managed WordPress hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SSL certificates included
  • Daily backups
  • Malware scanning (SiteLock)
  • Domain lock protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer, Trustpilot
Marketing tools
Google Ads, marketgoo SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on Finnish market with localized content and language
  3. Comprehensive product offerings in domain registration, hosting, email, and website building
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  5. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent management
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via forms and support portal
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to registry restrictions
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is modern and robust, leveraging WordPress CMS and proprietary Website Builder tools. The tech stack includes JavaScript frameworks, CSS, and integration with multiple third-party analytics and marketing platforms such as Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, and Trustpilot widgets. Performance is optimized with preloading fonts, lazy loading images, and CDN usage for static assets. The site is mobile-responsive and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. Technical risks are minimal, though the absence of some security headers and explicit security documentation represents a potential area for technical debt and future enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 +1Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 74/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with one.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review one.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.