Skip to main content

Security report for nutrient.io

PSPDF US Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nutrient, operated by PSPDF US Inc., is a technology company specializing in developer-friendly SDKs for advanced document functionalities such as PDF editing, eSigning, and workflow automation. Positioned as a leading PDF SDK provider, Nutrient targets developers and businesses seeking to integrate document processing capabilities into web, server, and mobile applications. The company emphasizes seamless integration, low-code solutions, and AI-powered document processing to enhance productivity and automation. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure leveraging modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot for consent management, and analytics tools like Plausible and VWO. The presence of SOC 2 Type II certification underscores a strong commitment to security and compliance. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with clear navigation and professional branding. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, use of CAPTCHA to prevent abuse, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy policies and legal disclaimers are comprehensive and accessible. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for technology firms, and does not detract from the legitimacy of the business. Overall, Nutrient presents as a credible, secure, and professionally managed technology provider with a clear market focus and strong digital maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing explicit security header documentation, continuous third-party script audits, and maintaining up-to-date compliance with evolving data protection regulations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nutrient.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nutrient.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nutrient operates in the technology sector, providing specialized PDF and document SDKs with advanced features such as eSigning and workflow automation. Its business model is B2B SaaS/SDK, targeting developers and enterprises needing document processing solutions. The company holds a SOC 2 Type II certification, indicating strong internal controls and security practices. Nutrient maintains an active social media presence and uses modern marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement. The company is small-sized, US-based, and focuses on innovation in document technology. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The business shows consistent branding and professional content, supporting a high trust level among its target audience.

Security posture

Nutrient exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, SOC 2 Type II certification, and use of security best practices such as CAPTCHA and cookie consent management. The website includes modern security controls but could improve by explicitly implementing and documenting security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The company appears compliant with GDPR and other relevant regulations. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced. Overall, the security culture is strong, supported by certifications and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Explicitly implement and document security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and SDKs to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Ensure all web forms include CSRF protection and secure input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Maintain ongoing compliance monitoring for GDPR, SOC 2, and emerging regulations to sustain trust and legal adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PSPDF US Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PSPDF US Inc.
Description
Nutrient provides developer-friendly SDKs for integrating advanced document functionality, including PDF editing, eSigning, and automation, into modern applications.
Key services
PDF SDKs, Document editing, eSigning, Workflow automation, Low-code development, AI document processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, PSPDFKit (PDF SDK), VWO (Visual Website Optimizer), Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow, PSPDFKit SDK
Platforms
Web, Mobile (SDK support)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • SOC 2 Type II certification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Plausible Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, VWO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place
  5. SOC 2 Type II certification indicates good security posture
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, common for tech companies
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity
  8. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Webflow CMS, PSPDFKit SDK for PDF functionalities, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, and analytics platforms like Plausible and VWO. Hosting is likely provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and accessibility features at a basic level. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted assets. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring and updates of third-party dependencies are recommended to mitigate risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nutrient.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nutrient.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.