Skip to main content

Security report for nutrient.io

PSPDF US Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nutrient, operated by PSPDF US Inc., is a technology company specializing in providing advanced PDF SDKs and document processing tools for developers and businesses. Their offerings include PDF viewing, editing, eSigning, workflow automation, and AI-powered document processing, positioning them as a leading provider in the document SDK market. The website reflects a professional and developer-focused business model, targeting enterprises and software developers who require seamless integration of document functionalities into their applications. The company holds a SOC 2 Type II certification, underscoring its commitment to security and compliance. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and integrates analytics tools such as Plausible and Visual Website Optimizer. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and bot protection via reCAPTCHA, although explicit security headers could be improved. From a security perspective, Nutrient shows a mature posture with certifications and privacy policies in place. However, there is room for enhancement in publishing vulnerability disclosure policies and incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is common and justified for technology companies. Overall, Nutrient presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and a solid technical foundation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and providing clearer incident response contact information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nutrient.io

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nutrient operates in the technology sector, focusing on document SDKs and workflow automation. Their competitive advantage lies in offering best-in-class PDF SDKs that integrate seamlessly across web, server, and mobile platforms. The business model is B2B SaaS/SDK, targeting developers and enterprises needing document processing capabilities. Revenue streams likely include licensing SDKs and subscription services. The company maintains a presence on major social media platforms and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools, indicating a growth-oriented strategy. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. The company emphasizes security and compliance, as evidenced by SOC 2 Type II certification and privacy policies.

Security posture

Nutrient demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and SOC 2 Type II certification, indicating adherence to recognized security standards. The use of reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms further enhance security and privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the website content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be elevated by adopting additional best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security@ or abuse@ email address, to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a strong security culture within the organization.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PSPDF US Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PSPDF US Inc.
Description
Nutrient provides developer-friendly SDKs for integrating advanced document functionality, including PDF editing, eSigning, and automation, into modern applications.
Key services
PDF SDKs, Document editing, eSigning, Workflow automation, Low-code development, AI document processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, PSPDFKit SDK, VWO (Visual Website Optimizer), Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Web, Mobile (SDKs for mobile apps)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • SOC 2 Type II certification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, VWO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or malformed request
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. SOC 2 Type II certification indicates good security posture
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. No visible contact phone numbers, but support email and physical address present
  8. No explicit terms of service page found
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including Webflow CMS, JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and analytics tools like Plausible and VWO. The integration of PSPDFKit SDK indicates a focus on advanced document processing capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and employs cookie consent management via Cookiebot. Hosting appears to be via Webflow, a reliable platform. Technical debt is minimal, but the site could benefit from improved accessibility and additional security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nutrient.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nutrient.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.