Skip to main content

Security report for leadoo.com

Leadoo Marketing Technologies · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadoo Marketing Technologies operates a leading conversion platform designed to transform passive website visitors into active leads, customers, and sales opportunities. Positioned as a market leader in the conversion technology sector, Leadoo offers a comprehensive SaaS solution suite including Conversion Kit, Conversion Insights, and Conversion Experts, enhanced by AI-driven personalization. Their platform targets marketers and sales teams aiming to optimize website performance and customer engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot, though performance optimization is needed due to slow load times. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, SPF, and DMARC configured, but could be improved by enabling HSTS and additional security headers. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring comprehensive policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Leadoo demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence with extensive marketing and analytics capabilities.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leadoo.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadoo.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadoo holds a strong position in the technology sector focused on conversion optimization and lead generation. Their business model revolves around SaaS offerings with tiered pricing and expert services included. The company benefits from parent company SALESmanago, enhancing its market reach and resources. Their customer base spans B2B and B2C sectors, with use cases in recruitment, customer service, and interactive marketing. Trust signals include multiple G2 badges and detailed case studies. The company actively engages in content marketing through blogs, events, and success stories, supporting growth and customer education. Partnerships and integrations with major platforms like Google, Facebook, and HubSpot indicate a mature ecosystem. The website's multilingual support and accessibility features suggest a focus on international markets, particularly Finland and English-speaking regions.

Security posture

Leadoo's security posture is generally good, with HTTPS enforced and a valid SSL certificate issued by a recognized authority. DNS records include SPF and DMARC policies to protect email integrity and reduce spoofing risks. No subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were detected. However, the absence of HSTS and other security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. The website uses multiple third-party scripts and marketing tools, which require ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were found in the analysis. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site maintains a secure baseline but should adopt additional best practices to strengthen defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Optimize website performance by reducing resource load and improving caching strategies to enhance user experience and SEO.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrations with Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS management but does not appear to use Cloudflare's WAF or security challenge features. Performance is suboptimal with a load time exceeding 11 seconds and a high number of resources (194), indicating potential for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and accessible navigation. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter Cards, and JSON-LD structured data. The site employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities to improve SSL configuration and security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but would benefit from performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low26 findingsView report
  2. 78/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadoo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadoo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.