Skip to main content

Security report for gooddata.com

GoodData · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GoodData is an established enterprise SaaS company founded in 2007, specializing in composable data and analytics platforms. Their website presents a comprehensive suite of AI-assisted analytics, business intelligence, embedded analytics, and data monetization services targeted at businesses and developers. The company is recognized as a niche player in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for BI and Analytics Platforms, reinforcing its market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, HubSpot forms, and analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, delivering a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and privacy policies in place, though explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms could be improved. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence with clear business and contact information, supporting trust and engagement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gooddata.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gooddata.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gooddata.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
558
Employees
3
Customers
549
Third parties
6
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 53 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gooddata.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –secure.gooddata.com2025-07-20
  • –secure.gooddata.com2025-07-20
  • –secure.gooddata.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GoodData operates in the technology sector, focusing on delivering scalable analytics solutions that integrate AI and machine learning capabilities. Their business model revolves around a SaaS platform offering customizable data applications with options for trials and demos, targeting enterprises and software developers. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a strong ecosystem with dedicated support, professional services, and community engagement. Market positioning is solidified by Gartner recognition and positive customer testimonials. Growth indicators include a diverse product portfolio and emphasis on data monetization strategies. The website content and structure support clear communication of value propositions and industry-specific solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure form handling, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security.txt file and incident response contact information limits transparency in vulnerability disclosure and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security maturity is appropriate for an enterprise SaaS provider but could benefit from additional best practices to strengthen defenses and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Enhance transparency on data retention policies and user privacy practices to reinforce GDPR compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy incorporating continuous monitoring, incident response planning, and employee security training.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GoodData
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoodData
Description
GoodData is a leading composable data and analytics platform. Build, embed, and scale analytics on demand, with zero vendor lock-in.
Key services
AI-assisted analytics, Business Intelligence, Embedded Analytics, Analytics as Code, Query Acceleration, Data Monetization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bootstrap, HubSpot forms, AddSearch, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA
  • Privacy and cookie policies present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and professional design
  3. Comprehensive product and solution offerings
  4. Clear contact and support channels
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  6. No security or privacy red flags detected in content
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Bootstrap for responsive design, HubSpot for content management and forms, and integrates analytics tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with multimedia content such as videos enhancing user engagement but potentially impacting load times. The use of CDN for scripts and fonts supports scalability. Technical debt appears minimal, though opportunities exist to optimize performance further and implement advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence aligned with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gooddata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gooddata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.