Skip to main content

Security report for gooddata.com

GoodData · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GoodData is a well-established enterprise technology company founded in 2007, specializing in composable data intelligence and embedded AI platforms. The company offers a broad suite of analytics and AI-driven services targeting businesses and developers seeking to embed intelligent applications and automate workflows. Their market position is strong, supported by industry recognitions such as Gartner Magic Quadrant and high customer satisfaction ratings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive resources, customer testimonials, and a clear value proposition focused on accelerating ROI through AI and automation. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Lottie animations, and HubSpot for marketing and form management. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, with good SEO practices and structured data enhancing search visibility. The use of Google Tag Manager and HubSpot indicates a moderate level of user tracking balanced with privacy compliance. From a security perspective, GoodData demonstrates a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement, recognized certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR compliance), and secure form handling. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional site content and business signals. Overall, GoodData presents a low-risk profile with a robust business model and digital maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts, and improving transparency around data retention policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gooddata.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gooddata.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
558
Employees
3
Customers
549
Third parties
6
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 53 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gooddata.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –secure.gooddata.com2025-07-20
  • –secure.gooddata.com2025-07-20
  • –secure.gooddata.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GoodData operates in the technology sector with a focus on embedded AI and analytics solutions for diverse industries including finance, healthcare, retail, and hospitality. Their SaaS business model emphasizes composable data intelligence platforms that enable clients to build, embed, and scale analytics with zero vendor lock-in. The company leverages partnerships and a strong ecosystem, including professional services and developer tools, to accelerate customer success. Market positioning is reinforced by Gartner recognition and positive user reviews on platforms like G2 and TrustRadius. The company targets enterprise clients and developers, offering scalable and customizable solutions. Growth indicators include active resource hubs, certification programs, and a broad industry reach. The partnership ecosystem includes cloud registration and support portals, enhancing customer engagement and service delivery.

Security posture

GoodData exhibits a mature security posture with multiple industry-standard certifications such as ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and compliance with EU GDPR. The website enforces HTTPS and employs secure form validation and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting adherence to privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, which could be improved to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks. The absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file and incident response contact details limits transparency and may delay coordinated vulnerability handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. Overall, the security practices align well with enterprise expectations but could benefit from enhanced disclosure and header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Create and maintain a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Publish clear incident response contact information to enable timely communication in case of security events.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize risk from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance data retention policy transparency and communicate it clearly to users to bolster privacy compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GoodData Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoodData
Description
GoodData is a leading composable data and analytics platform. Build, embed, and scale analytics on demand, with zero vendor lock-in.
Key services
Embedded agentic AI applications, Business Intelligence, AI Assistant, Embedded Analytics, Data Visualization, Analytics Lake, Security & Compliance, Query Acceleration, Analytics as Code, Data Automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Lottie animations, HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, Video HTML5, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
HubSpot (forms and marketing), Google Tag Manager
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Use of recognized security certifications
  • GDPR compliance
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied), HubSpot analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing tools.
  3. Clear business focus on embedded AI and analytics platforms.
  4. Good security posture with recognized certifications and GDPR compliance.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an established enterprise site.
  6. Multiple customer logos and testimonials enhance trust.
  7. Comprehensive resource and support sections available.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and robust technical stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Lottie for animations, and HubSpot for marketing automation and form management. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and event tracking, indicating a well-structured approach to data collection and marketing insights. The site is optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times with efficient use of media and scripts. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes are present, enhancing usability. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with opportunities to improve security header implementation and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gooddata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gooddata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.