Skip to main content

Security report for gmail.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

This website is the official Google Accounts sign-in portal, enabling users to authenticate and access Google services such as Gmail. As part of Google LLC, a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., it serves a global audience with a highly trusted and secure platform. The site employs advanced proprietary technologies and APIs to deliver a fast, responsive, and accessible user experience across devices. Security is robust, with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and secure form handling. Privacy compliance is moderate on this page due to the absence of explicit privacy or cookie policy links, which are typically found on other Google pages. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and strong business credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gmail.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmail.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gmail.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,139,694,692
Employees
319,350
Customers
398,472
Third parties
1,138,976,870
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-07-05 · 16,831 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gmail.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –smtp.gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –smtp.gmail.com2026-07-05

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate gmail.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
249
Registered
249
Resolving
249
High or critical
1

Last checked 2026-06-24

Masked preview

  • xn•••••••••••.comHighhomoglyph
  • xn••••••••••••.comMediumhomoglyph
  • qm•••.comMediumhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of gmail.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC is a dominant player in the technology sector, providing a wide range of internet services and products. The Accounts sign-in page is a critical component of its ecosystem, facilitating secure user access. The business model revolves around user data-driven services, advertising, and cloud computing. Google maintains a strong market position with extensive partnerships and a global user base. The site reflects Google's commitment to security, performance, and user trust, supporting its revenue streams and growth in digital services.

Security posture

The security posture of this website is excellent. It uses HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations, implements multiple security headers such as Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, and employs secure input validation on login forms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and security policies are not explicitly visible on this page but are well-documented elsewhere by Google. The site is resilient against common web threats and follows best practices for user authentication security.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance visibility of privacy and cookie policies on the login page to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Consider adding explicit links or references to security policies and incident response contacts for transparency.
  3. Maintain continuous security monitoring and regular updates to security headers and SSL configurations.
  4. Improve accessibility features further to ensure compliance with latest standards.
  5. Provide clearer user guidance on data protection and consent mechanisms during login.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google Accounts sign-in page for accessing Google services such as Gmail.
Key services
User authentication, Account management, Access to Google services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google APIs, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Proprietary Google frontend frameworks
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • Input validation on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Google Accounts sign-in page.
  2. Content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers are exposed on this page.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service links visible on this login page.
  5. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Uses Google proprietary technologies and APIs.
  8. No WHOIS data available for subdomain, consistent with large enterprise practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern tech stack including advanced JavaScript frameworks and Google APIs. It is hosted on Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high availability and performance. The site is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with clean HTML5 and CSS3 usage. SEO is well-managed with appropriate meta tags. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom-built platform. Performance is fast with efficient resource loading and minimal latency. Technical risks are low given Google's infrastructure and engineering standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low23 findingsView report
  2. 76/100 −7Low24 findingsView report
  3. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
  4. 83/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.