Skip to main content

Security report for gmail.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is the Google Accounts sign-in page, a critical entry point for users accessing Google's suite of services including Gmail. As a subdomain of google.com, it inherits the trust and brand recognition of Google LLC, a global technology leader and subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. The site is designed for a broad audience of internet users requiring secure authentication to access their Google accounts. The business model revolves around providing secure, reliable access to cloud-based services and user data management. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript and Google APIs, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure. It demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility standards. Security is robust with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form handling, reflecting Google's high security maturity. No vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected. Privacy and cookie policies are not directly present on this sign-in page but are available on Google's main domains, indicating a separation of concerns. The domain's WHOIS data is not separately available for this subdomain, which is typical and does not detract from legitimacy. Overall, the site is highly trustworthy and professionally maintained. Strategic recommendations include ensuring clear links to privacy and cookie policies on all user-facing pages, continuous monitoring for emerging threats, and maintaining transparency in data protection practices to uphold user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmail.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gmail.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,139,694,692
Employees
319,350
Customers
398,472
Third parties
1,138,976,870
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-07-05 · 16,831 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gmail.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –smtp.gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –gmail.com2026-07-05
  • –smtp.gmail.com2026-07-05

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate gmail.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
249
Registered
249
Resolving
249
High or critical
1

Last checked 2026-06-24

Masked preview

  • xn•••••••••••.comHighhomoglyph
  • xn••••••••••••.comMediumhomoglyph
  • qm•••.comMediumhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of gmail.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC holds a dominant market position in internet services and cloud computing. The sign-in page is a gateway to multiple revenue-generating services including advertising, cloud services, and productivity tools. The business model is based on user account management and secure access to services. Google targets a global audience ranging from individual users to enterprises. The company benefits from a vast partnership ecosystem and continuous innovation. The sign-in page's seamless user experience supports Google's competitive advantage by facilitating easy and secure access to its ecosystem.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, strong security headers, and secure form handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is implied through Google's corporate policies, though not explicitly linked on this page. Incident response and security policies are managed at the corporate level. The site is resilient against common web threats and employs best practices in authentication security. No immediate vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were identified.

Recommendations

  1. Add explicit links to privacy and cookie policies on the sign-in page for enhanced transparency.
  2. Regularly audit third-party scripts and APIs for security and privacy compliance.
  3. Implement visible user education on security best practices during sign-in.
  4. Enhance incident response contact visibility for user-reported security issues.
  5. Maintain continuous performance and accessibility improvements to support diverse user needs.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google Accounts sign-in page for accessing Google services such as Gmail.
Key services
User authentication, Account management, Access to Gmail and other Google services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google APIs, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Google Closure Library (likely)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • Anti-CSRF tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (likely)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Google account sign-in page with full functionality and no access restrictions.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is expected.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected on this specific sign-in page; these are typically linked on main Google domains.
  4. No contact information or business addresses on this page; Google contact info is available on corporate sites.
  5. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern tech stack with extensive use of JavaScript and Google APIs, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting on Google Cloud ensures scalability and reliability. The HTML and CSS are well-structured with accessibility considerations. No CMS detected as the site is custom-built. The technical infrastructure supports fast loading times and secure user interactions. Opportunities exist to further enhance SEO and user guidance on privacy matters.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 76/100 −7Low23 findingsView report
  3. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
  4. 83/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.