Skip to main content

Security report for galaxy.com

Galaxy · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galaxy is a global leader specializing in institutional digital assets and AI infrastructure, serving a diverse clientele including institutions, startups, protocols, and investors. The company positions itself prominently in the crypto economy, offering access and services related to digital asset management and AI-driven infrastructure. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging advanced tracking and consent technologies to ensure compliance and user experience. Technically, the site employs industry-standard tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that slightly detracts from the overall trustworthiness but does not overshadow the professional presentation and compliance efforts. Overall, Galaxy demonstrates a solid digital and security maturity appropriate for its market position.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of galaxy.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galaxy.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Galaxy operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital assets and AI infrastructure, targeting institutional clients and investors. Its business model revolves around providing access to the crypto economy and managing digital assets at scale. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms to optimize outreach and user engagement. While explicit business registration details are not publicly available, the brand consistency and market positioning suggest a large enterprise with significant industry presence. The use of advanced cookie consent and tracking tools indicates a commitment to regulatory compliance and data privacy. Growth indicators include a comprehensive digital footprint and integration with multiple third-party services. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced transparency in domain registration and contact information to bolster credibility further.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms that align with GDPR requirements. The use of Hotjar and Google Analytics is managed with user consent, reflecting privacy-conscious data collection practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits the transparency of the organization's security governance. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls to mitigate advanced threats and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility and user support.
  5. Review and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain registration transparency and reduce suspicion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galaxy
Description
Galaxy, a global leader in digital assets and AI infrastructure, serves institutions, startups, protocols, and investors. Gain access to the crypto economy.
Key services
Digital asset management, AI infrastructure, Crypto economy access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot, AdRoll, Google Analytics, Material Icons, FormaDJRMicro-Regular font
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional institutional digital asset management site
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a large enterprise site
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern technology stack with asynchronous loading of scripts and fonts, improving performance and user experience. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot demonstrates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses Material Icons and custom fonts for consistent branding. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript and preloaded assets, though further optimization could improve load times. Accessibility features are basic but present, with room for enhancement to meet higher standards. No CMS or hosting provider information was explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for a large enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galaxy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galaxy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.