Skip to main content

Security report for galaxy.com

Galaxy · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galaxy is a global leader specializing in institutional digital assets and AI infrastructure, serving a diverse clientele including institutions, startups, protocols, and investors. The company positions itself prominently in the crypto economy, offering access and services related to digital assets and blockchain technologies. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and a clear focus on its target audience. Technically, the site leverages modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, and Hotjar, indicating a high level of digital maturity and commitment to user experience and compliance. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and branding suggest a legitimate and established business. Overall, Galaxy demonstrates a strong market position and digital infrastructure but should enhance transparency and security disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galaxy.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Galaxy operates in the technology and finance sectors, focusing on digital assets and AI infrastructure. Its business model targets institutional clients and investors, providing asset management and infrastructure services in the crypto economy. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms to optimize outreach and compliance. While the website lacks explicit contact details and security policies, it maintains a consistent brand image and professional content quality. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap, potentially indicating privacy protection or recent registration. The company appears to be large in size with a global reach, though specific founding dates and parent or subsidiary relationships are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security score. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness perception. Implementing a vulnerability disclosure program and publishing security policies would strengthen the security culture and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security.
  5. Improve WHOIS data transparency or provide domain registration details to bolster legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galaxy
Description
Galaxy, a global leader in digital assets and AI infrastructure, serves institutions, startups, protocols, and investors. Gain access to the crypto economy.
Key services
Digital asset management, AI infrastructure, Crypto economy access
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, AdRoll, Reddit Ads Pixel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. No explicit contact information or security policy pages found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with HubSpot for marketing automation, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior insights. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured content. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site shows no signs of technical debt or performance bottlenecks. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and increase transparency around domain registration and security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galaxy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galaxy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.