Skip to main content

Security report for expoplatform.com

ExpoPlatform · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ExpoPlatform is a UK-based technology company specializing in AI-powered event management software designed for exhibition organizers and event professionals. Established in 2012, the company offers a smart events and community platform that facilitates engaging and ROI-driven in-person events and year-round communities. Their market position is that of a modern, innovative B2B SaaS provider with a focus on leveraging AI to enhance tradeshow experiences. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and contact details. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Heap, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which is a potential area for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, supporting the company's business credibility and digital maturity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of expoplatform.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching expoplatform.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ExpoPlatform operates in the technology sector, targeting exhibition organizers and event professionals with a SaaS business model. Their key services include event management software, AI-powered tradeshows, and community platforms. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms to enhance customer insights and marketing effectiveness. The domain age and WHOIS data support a stable and legitimate business presence. The company maintains a consistent brand and has a moderate-sized operation based in Cambridge, UK. Growth indicators include integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools, and a clear focus on AI-driven innovation. The absence of publicly listed certifications or incident response contacts suggests opportunities for strengthening trust and compliance posture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and domain status clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. The site lacks explicit advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended best practices. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Cookie consent is implemented effectively, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response information is absent, which could delay handling of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Implement advanced HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add incident response contact information on the website to improve readiness and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ExpoPlatform
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ExpoPlatform
Description
ExpoPlatform's event management software helps world-leading exhibition organisers to deliver engaging and ROI-driven in-person events and 365 communities
Key services
Event management software, AI-powered tradeshows, Community platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Pipedrive LeadBooster, Cookiebot Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and detailed
  3. Multiple analytics and marketing tools integrated
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business
  6. No WAF or blocking detected
  7. Content is professional and business-focused
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery and multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools. Hosting is provided via AWS, inferred from DNS servers. The site uses Google Tag Manager for tag management and integrates Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, and Twitter tracking scripts. Cookiebot manages cookie consent and compliance. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical infrastructure supports the business model well but would benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation to reduce risk and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with expoplatform.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review expoplatform.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.