Skip to main content

Security report for expoplatform.com

ExpoPlatform · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ExpoPlatform is a UK-based technology company specializing in AI-powered event management software designed for exhibition organizers and trade shows. Established in 2012, the company offers a SaaS platform that facilitates engaging and ROI-driven in-person events and year-round community engagement. Their market position is that of a smart, innovative solution provider in the event technology sector, targeting professional event managers and exhibition organizers globally. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages a modern technology stack including jQuery, Heap Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for compliance. Hosting is supported by AWS infrastructure, and the site demonstrates good SEO and mobile optimization practices. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy, though some security headers and DNSSEC could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. However, the absence of DNSSEC, CSP headers, and a security.txt file suggests room for enhancement in security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, showing a long-established presence without privacy protection, which supports legitimacy. Overall, ExpoPlatform presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with good business credibility and compliance practices. Strategic improvements in security headers and formal security policies would further strengthen their security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching expoplatform.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ExpoPlatform operates in the event management technology sector, offering AI-powered solutions for trade shows and exhibitions. Their business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on delivering software that enhances event ROI and community engagement. The company targets exhibition organizers and event professionals, positioning itself as a smart and innovative platform. Their digital presence is supported by a comprehensive marketing ecosystem including analytics, retargeting, and consent management tools. The company appears medium-sized, founded in 2012, with a clear UK base. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and structured data reflect a consistent brand and professional approach, with trust signals such as testimonials and social media presence. The absence of explicit privacy and terms pages is a minor gap in compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. The use of spam protection on contact forms and multiple analytics tools is noted. However, the lack of DNSSEC, CSP, and other security headers reduces the overall security score. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a compliance gap. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business, enhancing trust. No malware or phishing indicators were found. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding CSP and other security headers, and publishing a security.txt file to improve transparency and security readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure channel.
  4. Add additional security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Ensure privacy policy and terms of service pages are clearly accessible and comprehensive.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ExpoPlatform
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ExpoPlatform
Description
ExpoPlatform's event management software helps world-leading exhibition organisers to deliver engaging and ROI-driven in-person events and 365 communities
Key services
Event management software, AI-powered tradeshows, Community platform for 365 engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery, Heap Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Pipedrive LeadBooster, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, ShareThis, Cloudflare (DNS and security)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cookiebot for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of spam protection on contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, Canddi
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, Canddi, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Pipedrive LeadBooster, Cookiebot, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern analytics and marketing tools with extensive tracking.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data and visible on site.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with a professional design and good SEO practices.
  6. Security headers could be improved; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is business and technology focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a modern tech stack including jQuery and multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts. Hosting is via AWS, indicated by DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, integrating well with GDPR requirements. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing tools suggests a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with expoplatform.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review expoplatform.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.