Skip to main content

Security report for dipakgajjar.com

Dipak C. Gajjar · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dipak C. Gajjar is a seasoned freelance WordPress developer based in London, specializing in custom WordPress development, plugin creation, speed optimization, and ongoing support and maintenance. The business targets individuals, startups, small businesses, and digital agencies seeking expert WordPress services. The website positions the company as an award-winning consultant with a strong market presence, supported by testimonials and partnerships with notable clients such as NHS and Easy Digital Downloads. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using modern themes and plugins like GeneratePress and Easy Digital Downloads. It leverages Cloudflare DNS and integrates Google Analytics for performance monitoring. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, and there is no visible security or incident response policy. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness with minor areas for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency would further strengthen the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dipakgajjar.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dipakgajjar.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small freelance consultancy specializing in WordPress development and optimization services. It has established a reputable market position through long-term client relationships and partnerships with recognized brands. Revenue streams likely include custom development projects, plugin sales, and ongoing maintenance contracts. The target customers are primarily UK-based small businesses and digital agencies. The partnership ecosystem includes hosting and optimization service providers, enhancing service offerings. The company's digital presence is strong, with consistent branding, active social media, and SEO-optimized content supporting growth and client acquisition.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate to good. The use of HTTPS and domain transfer protection are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap. No incident response or security policy is publicly available, which could impact trust and readiness. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  5. Regularly audit plugins and themes for vulnerabilities and keep all software up to date.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dipak C. Gajjar
Description
Freelance WordPress theme & plugin developer in London specializing in speed optimization, custom development, support, and maintenance services.
Key services
Custom WordPress development, Plugin development, WordPress speed optimization, WordPress support and maintenance, Security monitoring, Site migration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), Easy Digital Downloads plugin, Cloudflare DNS, GeneratePress theme, GenerateBlocks, GP Premium plugin, Lazy loading scripts, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Font Awesome, SVG icons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong SEO and social media integration.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  5. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found on the homepage.
  6. Contact primarily via email and contact form.
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes.
  8. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business info.
  9. No visible security policy or incident response info on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with well-maintained themes and plugins. It uses Cloudflare DNS for domain resolution and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. Performance optimizations include lazy loading and speed optimization services. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with structured data implemented for SEO benefits. Technical debt appears low, but there is room for improvement in security configurations. The hosting environment is not explicitly stated but partners with SiteGround and Cloudways suggest reliable infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dipakgajjar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dipakgajjar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.