Skip to main content

Security report for dipakgajjar.com

Dipak C. Gajjar · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dipak C. Gajjar operates a professional freelance WordPress development business based in London, specializing in custom development, plugin creation, speed optimization, and ongoing support services. The website positions itself as an award-winning consultancy trusted by notable clients and partners, emphasizing high ROI and premium service quality. The business targets individuals, startups, small businesses, and digital agencies seeking expert WordPress solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including GeneratePress theme, Easy Digital Downloads, and Cloudflare DNS, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. SEO is well implemented with Rank Math PRO and structured data enhancing search visibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, though improvements are recommended such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and explicit GDPR indicators. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity, suitable for its target market and business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dipakgajjar.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business leverages a freelance model focusing on WordPress development and optimization services, generating revenue through service offerings and affiliate partnerships with hosting and performance tool providers. Its market position is strengthened by client testimonials, partner endorsements, and a long-standing domain registration since 2011. The target customer segments include startups and small businesses requiring tailored WordPress solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable hosting and optimization service providers, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include active blog content, social media engagement, and a well-maintained online store. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality service delivery and niche specialization in WordPress speed and maintenance.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS represents areas for enhancement. No incident response or security policy is published, which could improve transparency and readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries visibly, indicating good operational security. Privacy compliance gaps, such as missing cookie consent, may pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit plugins and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dipak C. Gajjar
Description
Freelance WordPress theme & plugin developer in London specializing in speed optimization, support, maintenance, custom development, and plugin development with over 17 years of experience.
Key services
Custom WordPress development, Plugin development, Speed optimization, Security monitoring, Updates and backups, Helpdesk support, Content management, Site migration, Fixing WordPress issues
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Easy Digital Downloads plugin, Cloudflare DNS, GeneratePress theme, GenerateBlocks, GP Premium plugin, Rank Math SEO plugin, Testimonials Showcase plugin, LazySizes (lazy loading), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional freelance WordPress development service based in London.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and SEO optimized.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage or metadata.
  5. Social media presence is strong with verified links.
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible in HTML source.
  8. Domain uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using a lightweight and popular theme (GeneratePress) and essential plugins for SEO, performance, and e-commerce. It leverages Cloudflare DNS for DNS management and likely CDN services, contributing to fast load times and good mobile responsiveness. Lazy loading and image optimization techniques are employed. The site uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking and Rank Math PRO for SEO optimization. Technical debt appears low with current versions of WordPress and plugins. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance. The overall technical setup supports a professional and scalable freelance service business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dipakgajjar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dipakgajjar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.