Skip to main content

Security report for cube.lv

Cube Aģentūra · Technology · Latvia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cube Agency is a well-established digital agency based in Latvia, specializing in combining technology and creativity to drive business growth online. With over 20 years of experience in digital creativity, technology, and UX design, Cube positions itself as a pioneer in the Baltic region. Their core services include accessibility, website development, UX and design, and digital marketing, targeting businesses seeking to enhance their digital presence and user experience. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Cookiebot is implemented for comprehensive cookie consent management, reflecting a mature approach to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides a detailed cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected in the content or scripts. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the professional presentation and clear contact details support legitimacy. Overall, Cube Agency presents a professional, trustworthy digital presence with good privacy and security practices. Strategic improvements could include enhancing security headers and publishing formal security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cube.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cube.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cube.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
98
Employees
10
Customers
51
Third parties
37
Weak passwords
30%

Latest record dated 2026-01-12 · 18 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cube.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –0.cube.lv2026-01-12
  • –0.cube.lv2026-01-12
  • –demo.cube.lv2025-09-20
  • –skola3141.cube.lv2025-07-20
  • –office.cube.lv2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cube Agency operates as a medium-sized digital agency focused on the Baltic market, offering specialized services in digital product design, UX, accessibility, and marketing. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive experience and proven solutions tailored to user behavior. The business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises and organizations seeking digital transformation and growth. The company maintains a professional portfolio showcasing selected works, indicating a strong market position. Partnerships with major platforms like Google and Meta for advertising and analytics reflect integration into the broader digital ecosystem. Growth indicators include active social media presence and a comprehensive service offering. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a robust cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and formalizing incident response communications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect any changes in data processing or regulatory requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cube Aģentūra
Description
Nozares celmlauži digitālajā radošumā, tehnoloģijās un UX dizainā Baltijas valstīs ar vairāk kā 20 gadu pieredzi. Cube stiprā puse ir sarežģītu digitālo produktu radīšana un to dizains. Dzīvē pārbaudīti risinājumi un pieredze lietotāju paradumos garantē klientu uzticību jebkura izmēra projektos.
Key services
Piekļūstamība, Mājaslapu izstrāde, UX un dizains, Digitālais mārketings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. Clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address in Latvia
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow)
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  8. Advertising and analytics tools are disclosed and consented
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare CDN, contributing to performance and security. The site shows good mobile optimization and accessibility features, with a clean and professional design. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the business goals effectively. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and improve SEO further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low27 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cube.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cube.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.