Skip to main content

Security report for cube.lv

Cube Agency · Technology · Latvia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cube Agency is a well-established digital agency based in Latvia, specializing in digital creativity, UX design, web development, and digital marketing services. With over 20 years of experience, they position themselves as industry leaders in the Baltic region, focusing on complex digital product creation and user experience design. Their target audience primarily consists of businesses seeking to grow online through technology and creativity. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and a portfolio of selected works. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS, uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery, and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Hotjar are used for analytics and user behavior tracking, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and dedicated security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the overall site professionalism and transparency in contact details support a positive legitimacy assessment. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cube.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cube.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
98
Employees
10
Customers
51
Third parties
37
Weak passwords
30%

Latest record dated 2026-01-12 · 18 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cube.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –0.cube.lv2026-01-12
  • –0.cube.lv2026-01-12
  • –demo.cube.lv2025-09-20
  • –skola3141.cube.lv2025-07-20
  • –office.cube.lv2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cube Agency operates in the technology sector as a digital agency offering UX design, web development, accessibility, and digital marketing services. Their market position is strong within the Baltic states, leveraging over two decades of experience. The business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises and organizations requiring digital transformation and creative solutions. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and long-term partnerships. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and social media engagement on Instagram and LinkedIn. The partnership ecosystem includes third-party service providers like Cookiebot, Google, and Meta for analytics and advertising. Growth indicators include a portfolio of notable clients and a focus on long-term client relationships. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company’s digital maturity is evidenced by the use of modern web technologies and compliance with GDPR through cookie consent.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Hotjar introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a digital agency website but could be improved by implementing recommended best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining recognized security certifications such as ISO 27001 to strengthen trust with clients.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cube Agency
Description
Nozares celmlauži digitālajā radošumā, tehnoloģijās un UX dizainā Baltijas valstīs ar vairāk kā 20 gadu pieredzi. Cube stiprā puse ir sarežģītu digitālo produktu radīšana un to dizains. Dzīvē pārbaudīti risinājumi un pieredze lietotāju paradumos garantē klientu uzticību jebkura izmēra projektos.
Key services
Piekļūstamība, Mājaslapu izstrāde, UX un dizains, Digitālais mārketings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Webflow
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional digital agency focused on UX, design, and digital marketing.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  4. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Multiple external trusted domains used for analytics and content delivery.
  7. Clear contact information with physical address and phone number provided.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1 and Cookiebot for cookie management. Google Tag Manager and Hotjar are integrated for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads CSS and JavaScript assets from CDN.prod.website-files.com, indicating use of a CDN for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing asset delivery and caching. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation and content sections. No CMS other than Webflow was detected. Hosting appears to be managed by Webflow, a reputable provider. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence with room for performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low27 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cube.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cube.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.