Skip to main content

Security report for commander1.com

Commanders Act · Technology · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Commanders Act is a technology company specializing in digital marketing and data management solutions, targeting enterprises and digital marketers. The website content is minimal, focusing on branding and basic company presence with limited descriptive content or user engagement features. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS, utilizing common libraries such as jQuery and Google Fonts, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS servers. The site shows basic mobile optimization and moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers, indicating room for improvement in hardening and compliance. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which impacts GDPR compliance and user trust. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical vulnerabilities detected but requires enhancements in content, security, and compliance to improve trust and professionalism.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of commander1.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching commander1.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
35
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention commander1.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for commander1.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital marketing data management and customer journey analytics. Founded in 2013, it appears to be a medium-sized enterprise with a B2B business model. The website lacks detailed business information, contact details, and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. Social media presence is established on major platforms, supporting brand visibility. The absence of detailed policies and contact information may limit customer confidence and regulatory compliance. The company likely generates revenue through software or service offerings in digital analytics and data management. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks DNSSEC and critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No visible forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but the absence of security policies and incident response contacts indicates limited transparency in security governance. The site does not display GDPR compliance mechanisms like cookie consent banners. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is basic, suitable for informational sites but requiring enhancements for handling sensitive data or user interactions.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Commanders Act
Description
Commanders Act is a technology company specializing in digital marketing and data management solutions. The website content is minimal but indicates a focus on customer journey and digital analytics.
Key services
digital marketing data management, customer journey analytics
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.4, Google Fonts (Roboto), WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and lacks key pages such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service.
  2. No contact information or forms are present on the homepage.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and scripts.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  5. Social media links are present and consistent with the company brand.
  6. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery 2.1.4 and Google Fonts integration. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure based on DNS servers. The site uses canonical URLs and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced front-end technologies detected. The site lacks security headers and DNSSEC, indicating technical debt in security configuration. The minimal content and lack of interactive elements suggest low technical complexity but also limited engagement capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with commander1.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review commander1.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.