Skip to main content

Security report for commander1.com

Commanders Act · Technology · France

Medium risk. 12 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Commanders Act is a French technology company specializing in digital marketing and data management solutions, particularly focusing on customer journey analytics and tag management. The company appears to target businesses seeking to optimize their digital marketing efforts through data-driven insights. The website is built on WordPress and uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts, hosted on AWS infrastructure. However, the website content is minimal, lacking detailed business descriptions, policies, or contact information, which limits the depth of user engagement and trust signals. From a technical perspective, the website employs HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced security. The use of an outdated jQuery version may pose potential security risks if not regularly updated. No forms or data collection mechanisms are visible, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Security posture is moderate with basic HTTPS but missing several best practices such as security headers and DNSSEC. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with a stable history since 2013, supporting the business credibility. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable material. Overall, the website demonstrates a basic digital presence with room for improvement in content richness, privacy compliance, and security hardening to enhance trust and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching commander1.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention commander1.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for commander1.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Commanders Act operates in the competitive digital marketing technology sector, providing tools for customer journey analytics and tag management. Their business model is primarily B2B SaaS with consulting services. The company is positioned as an established player in France with a decade of domain presence. The lack of visible detailed business information and policies on the website suggests a potential focus on direct client engagement rather than broad public marketing. The social media presence on major platforms indicates efforts to maintain brand visibility. The company likely generates revenue through subscriptions and professional services. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, which is mandatory, but no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided HTML content. The use of an outdated jQuery version (2.1.4) could expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements in technical controls and transparency to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  5. Add visible contact information and security incident response details to improve transparency and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Commanders Act
Description
Commanders Act is a technology company providing digital marketing and data management solutions, focusing on customer journey analytics and tag management.
Key services
Customer journey analytics, Tag management, Data management platform services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.4, Google Fonts (Roboto), WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and lacks detailed business or policy pages.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided content.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with some outdated jQuery version (2.1.4).
  5. No visible forms or data collection fields detected.
  6. Social media links are present in JSON-LD but not in visible HTML anchors.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
  9. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond jQuery and Google Fonts.
  10. Content safety rating is safe with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses jQuery 2.1.4 and Google Fonts for frontend styling. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS servers. The site has basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. The HTML content is valid but minimal, with no forms or interactive elements detected. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site would benefit from modernization of its technology stack and improved content management to enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with commander1.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review commander1.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.