Security report for clickcease.com
ClickCease™ · Technology · N/a
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
ClickCease™ is a leading SaaS provider specializing in click fraud detection and prevention for digital advertising campaigns across Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and Microsoft Ads. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including real-time blocking of fraudulent clicks, bot detection, competitor click blocking, and detailed analytics dashboards. With over 2 million campaigns protected and thousands of customers worldwide, ClickCease holds a strong market position supported by positive customer reviews and industry approvals from Google and Meta APIs. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, clear messaging, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform and integrates a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads tracking, and various marketing and analytics tools such as ProfitWell, Exponea, and Split.io. The site is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a seamless user experience. Privacy compliance is robust with a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR/CCPA adherence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs best practices such as secure API integrations and cookie consent management. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly visible in the HTML content and could be improved. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, nor a vulnerability disclosure program, which are areas for enhancement. Overall, ClickCease.com presents a trustworthy and mature online presence with strong business credibility and technical infrastructure. The risk profile is low with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 65/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching clickcease.com
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 82
- Security headers
- 80
- Email security
- 75
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 65
- Average
- 80
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and explicitly configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
- Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
- Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
- Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
- Enhance user privacy controls by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer opt-out mechanisms.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- ClickCease™
- Description
- ClickCease™ is an impression and click-fraud detection and protection service software that detects and blocks click fraud on Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and Microsoft Ads campaigns. It automatically blocks competitors, bots, and fake clicks to protect PPC ad budgets.
- Key services
- Click fraud detection and blocking, Google Ads protection, Facebook Ads protection, Bot Zapping for Wordpress websites, Click fraud reporting dashboard, Refund assistance for Google Ads
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads tracking, Adobe DTM, ProfitWell, Split.io, Exponea, Tapfiliate, ChiliPiper, UserWay accessibility widget, Lozad.js lazy loading
- Frameworks
- Webflow, jQuery
- Platforms
- Cloudfront CDN, Google Ads, Facebook Ads
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google and Meta approved APIs
- Cookie consent banner with granular controls
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure forms with validation
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics, Bing Analytics, Exponea
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Twitter Pixel
- Marketing tools
- ProfitWell, ChiliPiper, Exponea, Split.io
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
- Strong focus on click fraud protection for paid advertising platforms
- Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented
- Multiple tracking and marketing technologies integrated for analytics and advertising
- No critical security issues or vulnerabilities detected in HTML content
- Contact information primarily via support@clickcease.com and contact forms
- No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
- No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present
- WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of business
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 83/100Low23 findingsView report
- 83/100Low24 findingsView report
- 83/100Low23 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with clickcease.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickcease.com.