Skip to main content

Security report for clickcease.com

ClickCease · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ClickCease is a specialized SaaS provider offering advanced click fraud detection and protection software primarily for Google Ads and Facebook Ads campaigns. The company positions itself as an industry leader with over 2 million campaigns protected and a strong customer base exceeding 14,000 advertisers. Their services include real-time blocking of fraudulent clicks, competitor click detection, bot zapping for websites, and detailed reporting dashboards. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content including testimonials, case studies, and educational resources. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, multiple analytics and tracking tools, and integrates with major ad platforms via approved APIs. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR/CCPA commitment, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or recent registration, which slightly reduces domain trust but is common for SaaS companies. Overall, ClickCease demonstrates a mature digital presence with robust technical infrastructure and a clear market focus on ad fraud prevention.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clickcease.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ClickCease operates in the technology sector, targeting advertisers and marketing agencies concerned with protecting their PPC budgets from click fraud. Their SaaS business model includes free trials and subscription plans, supported by a strong brand presence and customer trust signals such as reviews and case studies. The company is part of CHEQ, a parent organization, which adds credibility. Their competitive advantage lies in real-time fraud detection, multi-platform protection (Google, Facebook, Wordpress), and integration with major ad networks. The marketing ecosystem includes affiliate programs and extensive use of analytics and tracking tools to optimize customer acquisition and retention. The website content and structure support lead generation through contact forms and scheduling tools. Growth indicators include a large number of protected campaigns and active customer testimonials. Strategic partnerships and integrations with platforms like Google and Meta enhance their market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses approved APIs from Google and Meta, indicating a secure integration approach. Security best practices include automatic blocking of fraudulent IPs and secure data handling in forms. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly implemented, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is demonstrated through a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR/CCPA commitment, but the absence of a cookie consent banner is a minor compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and CCPA regulations.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ClickCease
Description
ClickCease™ is an impression and click-fraud detection and protection service software that detects and blocks click fraud on Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and websites. It automatically blocks competitors and bots from wasting PPC ad budgets.
Key services
Click fraud detection and blocking, Google Ads protection, Facebook Ads protection, Bot Zapping for Wordpress websites, Click fraud reporting dashboard, Refund assistance for Google Ads
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ProfitWell, ZoomInfo Pixel, Tapfiliate, Exponea, UserWay Accessibility Widget, ChiliPiper scheduling, Split.io A/B testing
Frameworks
Webflow, jQuery
Platforms
Wordpress (Bot Zapping product), Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google and Meta approved APIs
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, ProfitWell, Exponea
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Bing Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel
Marketing tools
ProfitWell, ChiliPiper, Split.io, Exponea
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Professional design and clear navigation with multi-language support.
  3. Strong focus on click fraud protection for Google and Facebook Ads.
  4. Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
  5. Use of many third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR mention.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or recent registration.
  8. No direct phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and forms.
  9. Social media presence on major platforms confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery and Split.io for A/B testing. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Twitter tracking, ProfitWell for subscription analytics, and Exponea for customer data platform services. Hosting is likely provided by Webflow, ensuring fast loading times and excellent mobile optimization. Accessibility is enhanced by the inclusion of the UserWay widget. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. The technical implementation is modern and robust, supporting a seamless user experience and effective marketing operations. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and cookie consent mechanisms to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 83/100 +3Low23 findingsView report
  3. 80/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clickcease.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickcease.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.