Security report for clickcease.com
ClickCease · Technology · N/a
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.
ClickCease is a specialized SaaS company providing advanced click fraud detection and protection software primarily for Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and website traffic. Positioned as an industry leader, it serves over 14,000 advertisers globally and protects more than 2 million campaigns. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including real-time blocking of fraudulent clicks, competitor click notifications, and detailed reporting dashboards. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content including testimonials, case studies, and detailed product descriptions. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, multiple analytics and tracking tools, and integrates with major ad platforms via approved APIs, ensuring robust digital infrastructure and marketing capabilities. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved and explicit incident response contacts are not publicly listed. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism which could be enhanced. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professionalism and association with CHEQ support its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding cookie consent, and publishing incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 65/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching clickcease.com
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 95
- Security headers
- 80
- Email security
- 75
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 65
- Average
- 83
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen web security.
- Add a visible cookie consent mechanism to ensure full GDPR and CCPA compliance.
- Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
- Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities.
- Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency if possible to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- ClickCease
- Description
- ClickCease™ is an impression and click-fraud detection and protection service software that detects and blocks click fraud on Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and websites. It automatically blocks competitors and bots from wasting PPC ad budgets.
- Key services
- Google Ad protection, Facebook Ad protection, Bot Zapping for websites, Click fraud detection and blocking, Competitor click notifications, Click fraud reporting dashboard
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing UET, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ProfitWell, Tapfiliate, Exponea, Split.io, ChiliPiper, UserWay accessibility widget, Lozad.js lazy loading
- Frameworks
- Webflow
- Platforms
- Webflow hosting
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google and Meta approved APIs
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure forms with validation
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing UET, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Exponea
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Bing Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, Bing UET, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Tapfiliate
- Marketing tools
- ProfitWell, ChiliPiper, Exponea, Split.io
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
- Professional SaaS offering focused on click fraud protection for digital advertisers.
- Strong branding and consistent messaging throughout the site.
- Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
- Comprehensive use of modern tracking and marketing technologies.
- No explicit security policy or incident response contact found publicly.
- Privacy policy and terms of service are clearly linked and comprehensive.
- No cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
- WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or domain registry policies.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 83/100Low23 findingsView report
- 83/100 +3Low23 findingsView report
- 80/100Low23 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with clickcease.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickcease.com.