Skip to main content

Security report for bunny.net

BunnyWay d.o.o. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bunny.net is a technology company providing a global edge platform that integrates Content Delivery Network (CDN), edge storage, streaming, DNS routing, edge scripting, and security services. Positioned as a reliable and high-performance platform, it targets businesses and developers seeking fast, secure, and scalable content delivery solutions. The website demonstrates a professional design with comprehensive content and clear navigation, supporting a strong market presence. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Gatsby and integrates analytics tools such as PostHog and Matomo. However, a critical security issue is the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the security posture. The company maintains proper email security records (SPF, DMARC) and provides clear contact information and trust indicators such as high ratings on Trustpilot and G2. Overall, the site is well-structured and professional but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bunny.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bunny.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bunny.net operates in the technology sector, focusing on edge computing and content delivery services. Its business model includes subscription and pay-as-you-go pricing, targeting a broad range of customers from small businesses to enterprises. The company emphasizes customer support with 24/7 availability and rapid response times, which is a competitive advantage. The presence of detailed product offerings and case studies indicates a mature marketing strategy. Partnerships with recognized platforms like Trustpilot and G2 enhance credibility. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand and high-quality content, aiming to expand its global network and service capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture of bunny.net is moderate but with significant gaps. While SPF and DMARC records are correctly configured, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS support are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and undermine trust. No advanced security headers or mechanisms like HSTS, OCSP stapling, or session resumption are implemented. The site does not display explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure programs, which could improve transparency and incident response readiness. The presence of an abuse contact email indicates some level of incident management. Overall, the security maturity is limited by the missing SSL/TLS configuration, which should be prioritized.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols to enhance encryption.
  3. Configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Establish a public vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React with Gatsby framework, Font Awesome for icons, and integrates analytics platforms like PostHog and Matomo. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the performance is slow with a load time of over 19 seconds and a large number of resources (470), indicating potential optimization opportunities. The absence of SSL/TLS impacts not only security but also SEO and user trust. The DNS configuration is standard with valid SPF and DMARC records, but lacks DNSSEC and CAA records. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires improvements in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 63/100Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 63/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bunny.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bunny.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.