Skip to main content

Security report for bunny.net

bunny.net · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

bunny.net is a technology company specializing in providing next-generation Content Delivery Network (CDN), Edge Storage, and Optimization Services globally. Established in 1999, the company positions itself as a global edge platform designed to accelerate web presence for businesses and developers. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on React and Gatsby frameworks, with good performance and mobile optimization. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident. Overall, bunny.net demonstrates a mature technology business with a solid market position but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bunny.net

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

bunny.net operates in the technology sector, focusing on CDN and edge computing services. Its business model revolves around providing scalable infrastructure solutions to web developers and enterprises seeking performance optimization. The company leverages social proof via Trustpilot and maintains social media engagement on Facebook and Twitter. The domain's age and registration details support a credible and established business. No direct parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company targets a global audience with technology-driven services, emphasizing speed and reliability. The lack of visible contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on self-service or account-based customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers, indicating good domain management practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers were detected in the provided content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency in security governance. The use of PostHog analytics and Trustpilot widgets introduces third-party scripts that require careful management to avoid privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize data exposure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
bunny.net
Description
Hop on bunny.net and speed up your web presence with the next-generation Content Delivery Service (CDN), Edge Storage, and Optimization Services at any scale.
Key services
Content Delivery Network (CDN), Edge Storage, Optimization Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Tailwind CSS, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by URL https://bunny.net/)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
Trustpilot widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML content
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is secured against transfer and has long expiry
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  7. Use of PostHog analytics and Trustpilot widget indicates user engagement and reputation management
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, supported by Tailwind CSS for styling and Font Awesome for icons. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices, indicating good technical implementation. Hosting appears stable with a long-registered domain and registrar consistency. SEO is supported by well-structured meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The presence of third-party analytics and review widgets indicates integration with marketing and reputation tools. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust with opportunities for enhanced accessibility and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 63/100 +7Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 56/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bunny.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bunny.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.