Skip to main content

Security report for br.com

.BR.COM · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website br.com operates as a domain registry service offering unrestricted .BR.COM domain registrations targeting businesses and entrepreneurs seeking a digital identity in Brazil with global reach. The service emphasizes availability of premium domain names without local restrictions, positioning itself as a niche alternative to the regulated .com.br domains. The business model revolves around domain registration facilitated through multiple leading registrars, supported by a professional and content-rich website. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, and Bootstrap Grid, hosted likely via CentralNic infrastructure. The website is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and clear navigation, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers which are recommended for enhanced security. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy and terms of use are present, but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented despite use of tracking scripts. Contact information is limited to a contact form and third-party support via Gen.xyz, with no direct company emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the domain registration service appears legitimate, well-branded, and professionally maintained with a high trustworthiness rating.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of br.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching br.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention br.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
168,258
Employees
35
Customers
166,594
Third parties
1,629
Weak passwords
20%

Latest record dated 2026-10-06 · 2,336 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for br.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –girorapidoclassificados.com.br.com2026-10-06
  • –live.com.br.com2026-10-06
  • –encanto.br.com2026-10-06
  • –br.com2026-10-06
  • –land.br.com2026-10-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector as a domain registry service specializing in the .BR.COM namespace. It leverages a unique market position by offering unrestricted domain registrations in Brazil, appealing to businesses seeking both local relevance and global reach. The business model is based on domain sales through partnerships with major registrars like GoDaddy and Namecheap, supported by a digital platform for domain search and registration. The target audience includes startups, established companies, and investors interested in premium Brazilian domain names. The company benefits from a long domain age (since 1998) and transparent WHOIS data, enhancing credibility. Partnerships with Gen.xyz for support and abuse handling strengthen operational capabilities. Growth potential lies in expanding domain registrations and increasing market awareness of the .BR.COM alternative to traditional ccTLDs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags set to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and protocol downgrade attacks. The site uses third-party analytics and tag management, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, raising privacy compliance concerns. Incident response is partially addressed through abuse contact information via Gen.xyz. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting recommended best practices and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of tracking scripts.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve trust and customer support accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
.BR.COM
Description
Provides an unrestricted, globally accessible domain space targeting Brazil, offering premium .BR.COM domain registrations without local restrictions.
Key services
Domain registration, Domain search and availability, Support services via Gen.xyz
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery 3.5.1, Underscore.js, Bootstrap Grid, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a niche domain registration service focused on Brazil with unrestricted access.
  2. Content is well-structured and professionally presented.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a form and third-party support (Gen.xyz).
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. Security practices are adequate but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  6. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Underscore.js, Bootstrap Grid, and Modernizr for feature detection. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is hosted under CentralNic's infrastructure, inferred from the registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and enhanced keyboard navigation. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low13 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with br.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review br.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.