Skip to main content

Security report for autopilothq.com

Ortto · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ortto is a technology company founded in 2016 that provides a SaaS marketing automation and customer data platform designed to unify data, messaging, and analytics. The website presents a professional and modern design built using the Framer framework and hosted on AWS infrastructure. The platform targets businesses seeking integrated marketing automation and customer data analytics solutions. The technical infrastructure is modern and mobile-optimized, though no CMS or advanced analytics tools are explicitly detected. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers or policies found. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of autopilothq.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autopilothq.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ortto operates in the technology sector focusing on marketing automation and customer data platforms. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium-sized businesses and enterprises needing integrated marketing and analytics tools. The company has a consistent brand presence and a clear market position as a unified platform provider. The domain age aligns with the company's founding year, indicating stable operations. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials suggests an opportunity to enhance credibility. The company appears to focus on direct business clients rather than consumer markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled (implied by canonical URL and domain hosting) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy publication and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and configure security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Introduce vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance website analytics and tracking with privacy-compliant tools to better understand user behavior.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ortto
Description
Ortto’s marketing automation and customer data platform unifies your data, messaging and analytics on a single platform.
Key services
Marketing automation, Customer data platform, Analytics, Messaging
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (site generator), Google Fonts, Open Sans font, Lato font, Instrument Serif font, Inter font
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Site uses modern fonts and Framer framework for design.
  5. Hosting DNS is via AWS, indicating reliable infrastructure.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in the provided content.
  8. No social media links or business certifications found in the provided content.
  9. Content is business-focused, targeting marketing automation and customer data platform users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer design framework with extensive use of modern web fonts and hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a reliable and scalable platform. The site is mobile-optimized and uses preloading for images to improve performance. However, no CMS or backend technologies are explicitly detected, suggesting a static or headless architecture. The absence of security headers and privacy policies points to technical debt in security and compliance areas. Performance is moderate with good SEO meta tags but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and faster load times. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for design and hosting but lacks advanced security and compliance integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autopilothq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autopilothq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.