Skip to main content

Security report for autopilothq.com

Ortto · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ortto operates as a technology company providing a SaaS platform that integrates customer data, marketing automation, and analytics into a unified solution. The website presents a professional and modern design built using the Framer platform, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure leverages JavaScript and web fonts with a focus on responsive design and user experience. Security posture appears limited based on the absence of visible security headers and explicit security policies, which suggests room for improvement in protecting user data and enhancing trust. Privacy compliance is weak due to the lack of privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance transparency to improve trustworthiness and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autopilothq.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ortto positions itself in the competitive marketing automation and customer data platform market, targeting businesses seeking integrated marketing and analytics solutions. The SaaS business model supports recurring revenue streams and scalability. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a clear value proposition, though no detailed business registration or contact information is publicly visible. The absence of explicit trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials limits external validation of market position. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website content. Growth potential is supported by the integrated platform offering, but strategic improvements in transparency and compliance could enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic, with no detected security headers or incident response information. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, reducing transparency for security researchers. The website uses HTTPS, but SSL configuration details are not visible. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. The business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory penalties and reduced customer trust. Enhancing security policies and implementing best practices is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including security and abuse contacts to enhance transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain strong encryption standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ortto
Description
Ortto’s marketing automation and customer data platform unifies your data, messaging and analytics on a single platform.
Key services
Marketing automation, Customer data platform, Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Framer, Google Fonts, Web Fonts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ortto tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Ortto marketing automation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Website uses Framer as CMS and frontend framework.
  5. Marketing automation and customer data platform is the core business offering.
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  8. Content is professional and business-oriented with good design and user experience.
  9. External links mostly to own subdomains and Framer resources.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer CMS and frontend framework, utilizing modern web fonts and JavaScript. Performance is moderate with preloading of key images and responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly visible. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Technical risks include the absence of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance, which could affect business operations and user trust. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autopilothq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autopilothq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.