Skip to main content

Security report for asseco.com

Asseco Group · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asseco Group is a large, established IT federation specializing in proprietary software solutions across multiple sectors including banking, insurance, public administration, healthcare, and telecommunications. The company operates globally with a strong presence in Europe and is publicly listed on several stock exchanges. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on TYPO3 CMS, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security best practices, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site projects a professional and trustworthy corporate image with comprehensive business information and clear contact channels.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of asseco.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asseco.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asseco.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
216
Employees
0
Customers
182
Third parties
34
Weak passwords
14%

33 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for asseco.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Asseco Group holds a strong market position as the 6th largest software vendor in Europe, leveraging a federated business model with multiple regional subsidiaries. Their competitive advantage lies in proprietary software development tailored to critical sectors such as banking and public administration. Revenue streams are diversified across sectors and geographies, supported by a broad portfolio of IT services and solutions. The company targets enterprise clients and public institutions, emphasizing long-term partnerships and sector-specific expertise. The website's linkage to multiple regional domains and business units highlights a coordinated global strategy. Investor relations and press releases indicate transparency and active market engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and integration of reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and missing explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options represent gaps that could expose the site to certain attack vectors such as DNS spoofing and cross-site scripting. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Data protection practices appear adequate with GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to reduce XSS risks.
  3. Add missing security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asseco Group
Description
Asseco Group is a federation of IT companies operating in over 60 countries, specializing in proprietary software solutions for banking, insurance, public administration, utilities, telecommunications, healthcare, and other sectors. It is listed on multiple stock exchanges and ranks 6th among top software vendors in Europe.
Key services
banking software, insurance solutions, public administration IT systems, healthcare IT solutions, ERP software, cloud and IT infrastructure services, telecommunication software, business intelligence, security solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS, Font Awesome, reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • reCAPTCHA v3 integration
  • Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Widgets
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Multiple regional and subsidiary domains linked.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  5. Security headers could be improved.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and extensible content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Integration of Google Tag Manager and analytics services shows a modern approach to marketing and data collection. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses standard web fonts and icon libraries like Font Awesome. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is well-suited for a corporate enterprise site but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNS security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asseco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asseco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.