Skip to main content

Security report for asseco.com

Asseco Group · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asseco Group is a large, established IT federation operating globally with a strong focus on proprietary software solutions for sectors such as banking, insurance, public administration, healthcare, and telecommunications. The company is publicly listed on multiple stock exchanges and holds a significant market position as the 6th largest software vendor in Europe. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on TYPO3 CMS, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools, and offering a multilingual, regionally segmented user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA protections, though there is room for improvement in DNS security and published security policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting the company's enterprise-level stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asseco.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asseco.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
216
Employees
0
Customers
182
Third parties
34
Weak passwords
14%

33 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for asseco.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a federated business unit model to serve diverse sectors with tailored IT solutions, emphasizing proprietary software development. Their market positioning is strong, supported by stock exchange listings and a broad geographic footprint. The business model focuses on long-term client relationships in regulated industries such as banking and insurance, with additional offerings in public sector and utilities. The website's content and linked domains confirm a well-integrated partner and subsidiary ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent financial news updates and a solid order backlog. The company maintains a professional brand image and transparent contact channels, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and publicly available security policies or incident response contacts indicates areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could be improved to meet higher enterprise security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asseco Group
Description
Asseco Group is a federation of IT companies operating in 65 countries, specializing in proprietary IT solutions for sectors including banking, insurance, public administration, healthcare, utilities, telecommunications, and more. It is listed on multiple stock exchanges and ranks 6th among top software vendors in Europe.
Key services
banking software, insurance solutions, public administration IT systems, healthcare IT solutions, utilities sector software, telecommunication software, ERP solutions, business intelligence, cloud services, security solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Font Awesome, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Widgets
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language/region options.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Multiple business units and sector-specific offerings clearly presented.
  4. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and integration of common analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and contact form.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
  10. Good use of HTTPS and reCAPTCHA for form protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature open-source content management system, and integrates widely used analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Twitter widgets. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, providing DNS resilience and performance benefits. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of assets and caching. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for an enterprise IT services company, though some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers are missing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asseco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asseco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.