Skip to main content

Security report for asana.com

Asana · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asana, Inc. is a leading technology company specializing in work management and team collaboration software. Founded in 2009, Asana offers a SaaS platform that enables businesses and distributed teams to manage projects, tasks, and workflows efficiently. The company holds a strong market position as a top-tier provider in the productivity software sector, targeting enterprises and teams globally. Their website reflects a professional and polished brand image, with comprehensive descriptions of their services and a clear focus on business users. Technically, Asana's website is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility standards. It integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, DataDog RUM, and OneTrust for privacy compliance and user consent management. The technical implementation supports a seamless user experience with robust SEO and security practices. From a security perspective, Asana maintains a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and recognized certifications like ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II. The company provides clear security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information, indicating mature security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the website content or domain registration data. Overall, Asana presents a low-risk profile with high business credibility, strong privacy compliance, and a secure, well-maintained digital presence. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC for enhanced domain security and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting. These steps would further strengthen their security transparency and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of asana.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asana.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
97
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Asana operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS-based work management solutions. Their business model revolves around subscription services targeting medium to large enterprises and distributed teams. The company leverages a strong brand presence and certifications to differentiate itself in a competitive market. Their partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms and marketing tools, enhancing their product offering. Growth indicators include continuous feature experimentation and a global user base. The company maintains a consistent and professional online presence, supporting its market leadership and customer trust.

Security posture

Asana exhibits a mature security posture with comprehensive policies and certifications. The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers to protect users. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels are clearly defined, supporting rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy compliance is robust, with GDPR-aligned consent mechanisms and a dedicated Data Protection Officer contact. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The security culture is evident through transparent communication and adherence to industry standards. Minor improvements such as DNSSEC enablement and security.txt publication are recommended to enhance domain security and vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the asana.com domain to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance domain security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file at the root of the domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention policies related to analytics and user tracking.
  5. Continue to promote security awareness and culture internally and externally to maintain trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asana
Description
Work anytime, anywhere with Asana. Keep remote and distributed teams, and your entire organization, focused on their goals, projects, and tasks with Asana.
Key services
Project management, Task tracking, Team collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, DataDog RUM, OneTrust, AWS DNS
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Error handling with logging
  • Security incident response contact
  • Use of security certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, DataDog RUM, Contentsquare
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
DataDog RUM, Contentsquare
Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  3. Multiple security certifications and policies publicly available
  4. Comprehensive analytics and marketing tools in use with consent management
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Clear business and contact information provided
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks React and Next.js, ensuring a responsive and dynamic user experience. Hosting on Amazon AWS provides scalable and reliable infrastructure. The site uses advanced analytics and consent management tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Performance is optimized with preloading of CSS and scripts, and accessibility considerations are evident in semantic HTML and ARIA roles. The technical stack is well-maintained with no deprecated or vulnerable components detected. Opportunities exist to further modernize by enabling DNSSEC and improving security.txt adoption.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asana.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asana.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.