Skip to main content

Security report for asana.com

Asana · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asana, Inc. is a leading enterprise SaaS provider specializing in project and work management solutions that enable teams and organizations to collaborate effectively and manage tasks and projects online. Founded in 2009, Asana has established itself as a key player in the technology sector with a strong market position supported by a comprehensive suite of services including task management, project tracking, and team collaboration tools. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, professional design, and clear navigation tailored to business users worldwide. Technically, Asana's website leverages modern web technologies such as React and integrates advanced analytics and consent management tools like Google Analytics, Optimizely, and OneTrust. Hosting is provided by Amazon AWS, ensuring scalability and reliability. The site demonstrates fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility features, indicating a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, Asana maintains a robust posture with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers implemented, and recognized certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II. The company publishes detailed security and privacy policies, including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, reflecting a strong commitment to data protection and compliance with GDPR. No significant vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, Asana presents a low-risk profile with high business credibility, strong privacy compliance, and a secure, well-architected web presence. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC for enhanced domain security, publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting, and providing explicit Data Protection Officer contact details to further strengthen compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asana.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Asana operates in the technology sector as an essential enterprise SaaS provider focused on project and work management. Its business model is subscription-based, targeting businesses, teams, and organizations seeking productivity and collaboration solutions. The company enjoys a strong market position with a well-recognized brand and a comprehensive service offering. Revenue streams are primarily from SaaS subscriptions. The company maintains a professional partnership ecosystem and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement. Growth indicators include continuous website experimentation and regional targeting. The company is headquartered in the United States and has a mature digital footprint with consistent branding and high-quality content.

Security posture

Asana demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to industry best practices. The presence of ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications underscores its commitment to security standards. The website includes detailed security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure guidelines, although a security.txt file is not published. Consent management is robust, leveraging OneTrust to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security score is high, reflecting strong controls and transparency. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC and publishing additional compliance contact information to enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  3. Provide explicit Data Protection Officer contact information to enhance GDPR compliance transparency.
  4. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user education on privacy and security practices through visible website resources.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asana
Description
Work anytime, anywhere with Asana. Keep remote and distributed teams, and your entire organization, focused on their goals, projects, and tasks with Asana.
Key services
Task management, Project tracking, Team collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Optimizely, Google Analytics, OneTrust
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security and privacy policies published
  • Consent management via OneTrust
  • Error handling with monitoring
  • Use of security certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Datadog RUM, Optimizely
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong privacy and security posture with published policies and certifications.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  5. Comprehensive consent management implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and JavaScript, with integrations for analytics (Google Analytics, Datadog RUM) and experimentation (Optimizely). Hosting is on Amazon AWS, providing scalability and reliability. The site is optimized for performance with fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are implemented to a good standard, and SEO optimization is comprehensive with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and modern web infrastructure with minimal technical debt and strong potential for future scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asana.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asana.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.