Skip to main content

Security report for arkoselabs.com

Arkose Labs · Technology · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arkose Labs is a technology company specializing in fraud and abuse prevention solutions, offering a comprehensive platform to mitigate bots, prevent account takeovers, and reduce online fraud risks. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture and protect digital assets. Their market position is that of a recognized provider in the fraud prevention space, leveraging advanced technology and integrations with marketing and analytics tools to deliver effective solutions. The website infrastructure is built on WordPress with Elementor, utilizing modern technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and various marketing automation tools including Marketo and Clearbit. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with strong SEO, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, secure link practices, and cookie consent management via OneTrust. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not prominently published, which could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, though the absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security disclosures, publishing vulnerability disclosure policies, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of arkoselabs.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
    • Medium

      Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

      Domain can be transferred without authorization

      What to do: Enable domain transfer lock for security

Keep watching arkoselabs.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention arkoselabs.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
100
Employees
0
Customers
100
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
30%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for arkoselabs.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Arkose Labs operates a B2B SaaS model focused on cybersecurity and fraud prevention. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized platform that addresses multiple fraud vectors including bots, credential stuffing, and new account fraud. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based licensing and professional services. The target customer segments are enterprises and mid-sized businesses in sectors vulnerable to online fraud. Growth indicators include active marketing, social media presence, and integration with leading marketing platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes marketing and analytics service providers. The company maintains a consistent brand image and professional online presence, supporting its market credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Arkose Labs' website is good, with HTTPS enforced and secure link attributes implemented to prevent common web vulnerabilities. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent indicates compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps include missing explicit references to security frameworks or certifications. Enhancing security disclosures and providing clear incident response channels would improve the security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools for security risks.
  5. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve trust and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Arkose Labs, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arkose Labs
Description
Enable your genuine customers, mitigate bots and improve your cyber risk and online fraud decisioning.
Key services
Fraud and Abuse Prevention Platform, Bot Mitigation, Cyber Risk Decisioning, Account Takeover Protection, Credential Stuffing Prevention, New Account Fraud Prevention
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5.1.2, Yoast SEO Premium, Elementor, Marketo Forms, OneTrust Cookie Consent, LiveChat, Google Tag Manager, Munchkin Marketo, Clearbit
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Rel attributes on target=_blank links include noopener and noreferrer
  • Use of OneTrust for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused scripts and consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, G2 Crowd Attribution Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
G2 Crowd Attribution Tracking
Marketing tools
Marketo, Clearbit, LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and comprehensive website focused on fraud prevention technology
  3. Strong SEO and structured data implementation
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising minor concerns about domain registration transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Marketo, Clearbit, Google Tag Manager, and LiveChat. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO Premium. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. The infrastructure appears stable but would benefit from enhanced security header implementation and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low20 findingsView report
  2. 86/100Low20 findingsView report
  3. 92/100Low12 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arkoselabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arkoselabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.