Skip to main content

Security report for arkoselabs.com

Arkose Labs · Technology · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arkose Labs is an enterprise-focused technology company specializing in fraud and abuse prevention through advanced bot mitigation and cyber risk decisioning solutions. Their platform targets businesses seeking to protect digital assets and reduce online fraud, positioning themselves as a leader in the cybersecurity SaaS market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with modern frameworks like Elementor, integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo and Google Tag Manager, and implements robust security practices including HTTPS and security headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration details and dedicated security policy or incident response pages slightly detracts from transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture and business credibility suitable for enterprise clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
    • Medium

      Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

      Domain can be transferred without authorization

      What to do: Enable domain transfer lock for security

Keep watching arkoselabs.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention arkoselabs.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
100
Employees
0
Customers
100
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
30%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for arkoselabs.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Arkose Labs operates in the technology and finance sectors, offering a SaaS platform that mitigates fraud and bot attacks. Their business model is B2B, targeting enterprises requiring sophisticated security solutions. The company maintains certifications like SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, enhancing trustworthiness. Their marketing ecosystem includes partnerships with Marketo and Clearbit, and they maintain active social media channels. The website content and structure indicate a focus on high-value clients, with clear messaging around fraud prevention and risk management. Growth indicators include comprehensive service offerings and a professional online presence. No direct parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and secure handling of external links (rel='noopener noreferrer'). Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust, indicating GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information limits transparency for security researchers and customers. The absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is a missed opportunity for proactive security engagement. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arkose Labs
Description
Enable your genuine customers, mitigate bots and improve your cyber risk and online fraud decisioning.
Key services
Fraud and Abuse Prevention Platform, Bot Mitigation, Cyber Risk Decisioning, SMS Toll Fraud Protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Marketo Forms, Google Tag Manager, LiveChat, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure rel attributes on target=_blank links
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, G2 Crowd Attribution Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
G2 Crowd Attribution Tracking
Marketing tools
Marketo, Clearbit, LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on fraud prevention and bot mitigation.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing tools.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent mechanisms.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency but does not indicate malicious intent.
  7. Social media presence is consistent with company branding.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor framework, integrating modern technologies such as Bootstrap 5 and jQuery. Marketing and analytics tools include Marketo, Clearbit, Google Tag Manager, and G2 Crowd tracking scripts. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent management, reflecting attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, and mobile responsiveness is good. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS and security headers. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence suitable for enterprise clients.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low20 findingsView report
  2. 86/100Low20 findingsView report
  3. 92/100Low12 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arkoselabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arkoselabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.